[Rt4-whois] Help required - NOW EVEN EASIER!!

kathy at kathykleiman.com kathy at kathykleiman.com
Tue Aug 30 21:49:51 UTC 2011


Dear Sharon,
Please forgive my delay in responding to your materials, and thank you so
much for the extensive efforts you made in reviewing the comments, and
compiling them for our review.

I have the same feeling now as I did when I first read your sections -- I
am not certain what to do. What are your conclusions? What are your
recommendations? Based on the written comments, the oral comments in San
Francisco (when these definitions were open for public comment and there
seemed to be views of both support and concern), and especially your
expertise, experience and insight, what definitional language do you
recommend we adopt?  If I missed this, please forgive me!

The "Why" is ultimately what I think these chapters are about -- what is
our recommendation, and why are we recommending it? The more persuasive we
are, the more likely the ICANN Community will be to adopt and follow our
recommendations.

What I like best in your materials is the Feedback on LE Questionnaire.
This is really good material and I think we should find many ways to
incorporate it. Thanks so much for all the time and effort you and your
staff devoted to this survey. I truly think is much of value here for us
to use and share...

Best,
Kathy




> NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
>
>  Hello Everyone,
>
> Last week I sent out my part of the report - definitions for comment and
> assistance.  Response was
> limited ;-), but I still need your help.
>
> So - to make it even easier I have subdivided the work into three and you
> only need to look at the one which relates to the subgroup you were in.  I
> would like you to look at the definition, the feedback received and let me
> know if you think we should change it in light of that feedback. The first
> document is the key for those who fedback, the second the defination and
> comments and the third the longer version, should you be interested.  I
> have now incorporated the LE feedback from both Peter and I and summarised
> the comments, rather than just listed them.
>
> This will only take minutes PROMISE - and  I would really like to feedback
> at our next conference call and I am off next week - so you have until
> Monday 15th!.
>
> So - Producers and Maintainers - James, Susan and Wilfried
>        Applicable Laws -Kim, Omar, Michael, Lynn
>        Law Enforcement - Kim, Lutz, Peter.
>
> Here's hoping,
>
> Sharon
>
>
>
> Sharon LEMON OBE
> Deputy Director
> Cyber and Forensics
> Serious and Organised Crime Agency (SOCA)
> 07768 290902
> 0207 855 2800
>
>
>
> This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from
> disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be
> subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be
> unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for
> disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of
> contact, by email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning
> 0870 268 8677.
>
> All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment.
> Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the
> subject of lawful business monitoring.  E-Mail may be passed at any time
> and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from
> the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files
> transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to
> whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error,
> please contact the sender as soon as possible.
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless
> Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number
> 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal
> purposes._______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>





More information about the Rt4-whois mailing list