From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com  Mon Oct 31 17:41:36 2011
From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:41:36 -0700
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Follow up from Dakar meeting
Message-ID: <20111031104136.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.d7ee434198.wbe@email12.secureserver.net>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111031/38ce313c/attachment.html 

From emily at emilytaylor.eu  Mon Oct 31 18:18:24 2011
From: emily at emilytaylor.eu (Emily Taylor)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:18:24 +0000
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Follow up from Dakar meeting
In-Reply-To: <20111031104136.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.d7ee434198.wbe@email12.secureserver.net>
References: <20111031104136.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.d7ee434198.wbe@email12.secureserver.net>
Message-ID: <CAKWYFseixSZ2FGYssCtOY5_A1UnP0S083zzbWOL1so3i==-y+Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Lynn

We missed you in Dakar, of course, but were all appreciative of the work
that you put in to getting the consumer study on track for us.

I'm sure others will have views, but my recollection was that our
conclusions from the study were:

- Consumer awareness of WHOIS is very low.
- "consumers" in the traditional sense of the word, are not really
consumers of WHOIS
- "Consumers of WHOIS" are law enforcement, private industry around law
enforcement, brand protection and domain industry.

There are some good themes on what builds consumer trust, and the
opposite.

In general, we thought that the qualitative work also produced some
noteworthy results (particularly the observations of users' difficulties in
locating and understanding WHOIS, which personally speaking was my
strongest take-away from the study).

Can you let us know whether User insight will be writing up a report for us
to append to our review, or whether the power point slides are it?

Kind regards

Emily

On 31 October 2011 17:41, <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:

> Regret that I was unable to attend the Dakar meeting.  On top of that I
> was traveling
> during the meeting timeframe on Sunday.  I am planning to attend the next
> meeting in Costa Rica.
>
> However, I have some breathing room this week and will be happy to
> do further work on
> the Consumer Trust section, using the results and recommendations from the
> research findings,
> as well as the Executive Summary.
>
> Please let me know if this would be helpful.
> Kind regards to all,
> Lynn
>



-- 




*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111031/35a48d3b/attachment.html 

From emily at emilytaylor.eu  Mon Oct 31 18:23:51 2011
From: emily at emilytaylor.eu (Emily Taylor)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:23:51 +0000
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Next steps
Message-ID: <CAKWYFsfuTbXq1EfB2SFzww2oRp7qPYVwy4+H6b4v97MoUZiRpQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all

As promised, I'll be working through my comments on the mega-huge draft
this week, and circulating to the list.  If anyone else feels moved to do
this too, please do so, and we'll ask Alice to hold the pen and consolidate
the draft s if there are different proposed edits (there are bound to be).

My headline thoughts on the draft are:

- It's very good in places
- The narrative needs to come across more strongly, and having agreed our
draft recommendations will help us with this, as will the executive summary.
- There are some chunks of text which I'm struggling to know where to fit
in (if at all).
- Having had our discussion with Compliance, I'm minded to take out a lot
of the detail on the compliance effort and append a detailed letter with
suggested actions to the report, with conclusions and headline
recommendations in the text.

Lastly, before our next call, can we think about and circulate any
recommendations which fell off the radar screen during the last meeting.
The ones I can think of are:

- Lutz had a suggestion about some sort of portal which aggregated all
WHOIS data and provided reverse look up capability being run by a neutral
source (ICANN?).  I think this may have grown out of our Thick/Thin
discussions, but am not sure.  Lutz: would you be happy to draft out some
first ideas on this one for us?

- Sarmad: We have a placeholder for an IDN recommendation, and also for a
brief bit of text for the report.  Could you let us have this as soon as
possible?

Thanks


Kind regards

Emily


-- 




*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111031/e83ba9f3/attachment.html 

From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com  Mon Oct 31 18:39:49 2011
From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:39:49 -0700
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Follow up from Dakar meeting
Message-ID: <20111031113949.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.7bb52e5bf7.wbe@email12.secureserver.net>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111031/d59e9658/attachment.html 

From denise.michel at icann.org  Tue Nov  1 20:30:23 2011
From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:30:23 -0700
Subject: [Rt4-whois] IDNs
In-Reply-To: <CAPcHvQE1kuQ80hdL83KwDu_qfwb_eKSsmunD9fmhQLxoT6XsRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPcHvQE1kuQ80hdL83KwDu_qfwb_eKSsmunD9fmhQLxoT6XsRw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPcHvQG6OLDcGF-VBGp7=XzNW2QjgkQx+feLjy4KaHUg4ZhHfw@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Team members,

I inadvertently included a draft answer for IDN-related question #3 in the
previous document I sent you.  Please disregard and use the attached as
Staff's response, which provides more (and more precise) information.  I
apologize for any inconvenience.

As always, please email me if you need additional information.

Regards,
Denise

Denise Michel
ICANN
Advisor to the President & CEO
denise.michel at icann.org
+1.408.429.3072 mobile
+1.310.578.8632 direct


On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Denise Michel <denise.michel at icann.org>wrote:

> Dear Team members,
>
> Attached is ICANN Staff's response to the IDN-related questions you
> conveyed last month.
>
> Please let me know if you need additional information.
>
> Regards,
> Denise
>
> Denise Michel
> ICANN
> Advisor to the President & CEO
> denise.michel at icann.org
> +1.408.429.3072 mobile
> +1.310.578.8632 direct
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111101/49569f2b/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: QUESTIONS FROM THE WHOIS POLICY REVIEW TEAM TO ICANN STAFF	UPDATED for delivery.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 182146 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111101/49569f2b/QUESTIONSFROMTHEWHOISPOLICYREVIEWTEAMTOICANNSTAFFUPDATEDfordelivery.docx 

From emily at emilytaylor.eu  Thu Nov  3 12:09:30 2011
From: emily at emilytaylor.eu (Emily Taylor)
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:09:30 +0000
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Draft letter to compliance - YOUR FEEDBACK PLEASE
Message-ID: <CAKWYFsdFPtN97Z7Hkk4yPqUGpBB=U3Yif+x_MoiP=2Km=kj-Yw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all

In Dakar, as a result of our communications with the Compliance team, we
agreed to lift a lot of the detail out of our report, and write them a
letter with our findings.

Here is my first draft.  I would be grateful for your honest feedback, and
particularly suggestions for shortening it.

Thanks

Emily



-- 




*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111103/f5028f9b/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Letter to compliance.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 1365063 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111103/f5028f9b/Lettertocompliance.docx 

From jbladel at godaddy.com  Thu Nov  3 16:59:45 2011
From: jbladel at godaddy.com (James M. Bladel)
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:59:45 -0700
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Draft letter to compliance - YOUR FEEDBACK PLEASE
Message-ID: <20111103095945.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.cb1a6c18d7.wbe@email00.secureserver.net>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111103/a4c8924e/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Letter to compliance JMB Edits.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 1293069 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111103/a4c8924e/LettertocomplianceJMBEdits.docx