[Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan draft(2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Nettlefold, Peter]

Hi Susan and all,

Thanks very much to all who worked on this new series of recommendations.

I'm sorry I missed the teleconference this morning, but just wanted to see if I understand this proposal correctly.

In short, is this a supplement to the position we agreed in Dakar? i.e. will the situation generally be that the registered name holder assumes all rights and responsibilities (as we discussed in Dakar), but in a special subset of cases (i.e. where the registrar clearly knows that a 'proxy' is being used) then some special rules apply?

Or to put it another way, will we be recommending that there should be special new rules for 'known' proxies (however defined), and in all other cases we do not acknowledge proxies?

I'm sorry if this was discussed this morning, but I'm just trying to understand the position.

As there isn't a recording up yet that I've seen, any advice on whether other team members have already commented on this would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Peter


From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi
Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2011 6:18 AM
To: rt4-whois at icann.org
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan draft(2).doc

Hello All,

I apologize for the delay in sending this and that it is still in rough draft.  The attached document contains Kathy's revisions and comments to my original proposed recommendation.   I have added proposed definitions for the terms we are struggling with.  These came out of discussions between James and I.

I feel that we must provide a clear recommendation on the proxy issue but I personally seem to keep moving towards drafting policy.  I am hoping we will have time to discuss on the call today as I have several questions for the team.

Susan


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
 and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
 review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
 intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
 copies of the original message. 

This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. 
MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111124/5df73ec5/attachment.html