[Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan draft(2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Fri Nov 25 21:11:31 UTC 2011

Hi James,

I can’t open either of the documents on my laptop but can view it on my iPhone not the most optimal.  Can you paste in to the body of an email and forward?

Susan

From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 10:09 PM
To: Mikhail Yakushev
Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan draft(2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Is anyone able to open these?

J.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan
draft(2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: Mikhail Yakushev <m.yakushev at corp.mail.ru<mailto:m.yakushev at corp.mail.ru>>
Date: Thu, November 24, 2011 11:56 pm
To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>, "Nettlefold,Peter"
<Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au<http://Peter.Nettlefold@dbcde.gov.au>>
Cc: "rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>" <rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>>
Dear James,
I am sorry to confirm that neither previous versions nor this format are readable…
Rgds,
M.

From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 8:26 AM
To: Nettlefold,Peter
Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan draft(2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Peter and Team:

Here is a second attempt with the Proxy document converted to an older version of Word.  I am currently using Word 2011 for MacOS, so I'm not sure what the issue is.

Please let me know if this works.

Thanks--

J.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan
draft(2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: "Nettlefold, Peter" <Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au<http://Peter.Nettlefold@dbcde.gov.au>>
Date: Thu, November 24, 2011 9:28 pm
To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>, "Emily Taylor"
<emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>>
Cc: "rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>" <rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>>
Hi all,
I seem to be having a technical problem opening documents from James. Am I alone in this? It happened with this one, and also with the one that had the edits to the recommendations.
James, or Alice – is it possible to re/send those two documents in a different format?
Thanks,
Peter

From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com]
Sent: Friday, 25 November 2011 1:27 AM
To: Emily Taylor
Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>; Nettlefold, Peter
Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan draft(2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Team:

While Susan and I worked (and will continue to work) on some of the language, here are my comments on the other sections.

Thanks--

J.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan
draft(2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>>
Date: Thu, November 24, 2011 3:30 am
To: "Nettlefold, Peter" <Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au<http://Peter.Nettlefold@dbcde.gov.au>>
Cc: "rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>" <rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>>

Hi Peter

As it's Thanksgiving, our US colleagues will (should) be offline for a couple of days.

My understanding from last night's call is that our proposal is to combine these proxy recommendations with the ones from Dakar.  In other words, instead of saying "we never acknowledge proxies" we say this.  Susan explained that they are currently working on defining what is meant by a proxy, and as you rightly point out there are different flavours of proxy.  There is the "deep" arrangement based on an ongoing trusting relationship (eg solicitor, client) where a proxy might not be obvious. My understanding is that we're not attempting to lift the veil on these.  They are not viewed as problematic.

What is viewed as within the ambit of these new draft recommendations are the higher volume, commercialised proxy services, where there is not really a pre-existing relationship between registrant and proxy provider, but this is a low cost add on at the point of registration.  The two parties don't really know each other that well.  These are the ones we're hoping to describe in our definitions, and they are the target of these recommendations.

I hope that this makes it clear, but obviously I do recommend you listen to Susan's description of their thinking from the audio when it's up.

Thanks

Emily
On 24 November 2011 02:32, Nettlefold, Peter <Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au<mailto:Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au>> wrote:
Hi Susan and all,

Thanks very much to all who worked on this new series of recommendations.

I’m sorry I missed the teleconference this morning, but just wanted to see if I understand this proposal correctly.

In short, is this a supplement to the position we agreed in Dakar? i.e. will the situation generally be that the registered name holder assumes all rights and responsibilities (as we discussed in Dakar), but in a special subset of cases (i.e. where the registrar clearly knows that a ‘proxy’ is being used) then some special rules apply?

Or to put it another way, will we be recommending that there should be special new rules for ‘known’ proxies (however defined), and in all other cases we do not acknowledge proxies?

I’m sorry if this was discussed this morning, but I’m just trying to understand the position.

As there isn’t a recording up yet that I’ve seen, any advice on whether other team members have already commented on this would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Peter

From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi
Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2011 6:18 AM
To: rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Proxy provider recommendation 112311 susan draft(2).doc

Hello All,

I apologize for the delay in sending this and that it is still in rough draft.  The attached document contains Kathy’s revisions and comments to my original proposed recommendation.   I have added proposed definitions for the terms we are struggling with.  These came out of discussions between James and I.

I feel that we must provide a clear recommendation on the proxy issue but I personally seem to keep moving towards drafting policy.  I am hoping we will have time to discuss on the call today as I have several questions for the team.

Susan

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.

This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate.
MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com>.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

--

   [Image removed by sender.]

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>

www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk>

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.

________________________________
_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.

This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate.
MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com>.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111125/2cfae211/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111125/2cfae211/image001.jpg 