[Rt4-whois] ACTION REQUIRED: What do I need to do now? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Wed Nov 30 01:18:08 UTC 2011

Likewise.

I've been trying to produce a "clean", without highlights, version. I made it through a few chapters but have now run into comments that indicate chapters should be removed, moved, etc. I'm getting lost. (I started with the version on the site dated 29 Nov.)

I can devote tomorrow to editing and cleaning up but will need assistance in determining what stays, goes, moves, etc.

Not sure we'll be able to get this out tomorrow. I attached what I have if anyone wants to take a look.

Bill

(The highlighting is a mess, but I think I have it figure out. It's time-consuming to deal with, but not impossible.)

On Nov 29, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Susan Kawaguchi wrote:

> I agree with Peter I cannot really tell what I am agreeing to.  Some of the comments are contrary to others so if I pick the one I am most aligned with then that makes sense to me but may not be the best for the report nor group.
>
> Should I edit the report in the way I am comfortable with it and then send my approved report to Alice?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nettlefold, Peter
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:34 PM
> To: 'lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com'; 'emily at emilytaylor.eu'; 'rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org'; 'rt4-whois at icann.org'
> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] ACTION REQUIRED: What do I need to do now? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>
> Hello again all,
>
> I've been trying to work my way through the findings and recommendations in the report, but am not sure I'm reading the right parts.
>
> The recommendations section has several overlapping parts, so that there are several recommendations on basically the same thing, in slightly different terms - for example, the recommendations on accuracy studies and the establishment of a privacy accreditation scheme.
>
> The findings also seem to be spread in different parts of the report, and not in final form.
>
> I may be reading the wrong version, but its not clear to me now what I would be signing off on (even without the outstanding proxy issue). Is this an issue others are having, or am I reading the wrong version?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nettlefold, Peter
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:16 AM
> To: 'lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com' <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com>; 'emily at emilytaylor.eu' <emily at emilytaylor.eu>; 'rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org' <rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org>; 'rt4-whois at icann.org' <rt4-whois at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] ACTION REQUIRED: What do I need to do now?   [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'll be trying to read the key parts of the report today while I'm in meetings.
>
> Thanks to all, as I agree we've made a huge amount of progress. Special thanks also to Emily for keeping this whole show moving.
>
> That said, there still seem to be some open issues which need to be resolved before we release - particularly our direction on proxies. I'll be monitoring emails today so will be interested to discuss where we go on that issue, as it is clearly on of our most difficult, and equally one where the community will be expecting us to provide direction. I think we all share a common goal of improving the current situation and reducing the incidence and risk of misuse, so I hope we can come forward with something strong on this.
>
> I'm also interested in our timelines from here. How long will the report be out for comment? When are we aiming to publish the final?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com [mailto:lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 07:47 AM
> To: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu>; rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org <rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org>; rt4-whois at icann.org <rt4-whois at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] ACTION REQUIRED: What do I need to do now?
>
> Thanks Emily for your endurance and pulling us through.  Your request is reasonable.
> Lynn
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu>
> Sender: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org
> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:44:50
> To: <rt4-whois at icann.org>
> Subject: [Rt4-whois] ACTION REQUIRED: What do I need to do now?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
> copies of the original message.
>
> This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate.
> MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com>.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
> copies of the original message.
>
> This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate.
> MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com<http://www.axway.com>.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WCS - WHOIS RT - DRAFT REPORT - 29 NOV2011 rev 2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 634380 bytes
Desc: WCS - WHOIS RT - DRAFT REPORT - 29 NOV2011 rev 2.docx
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111129/29f23565/WCS-WHOISRT-DRAFTREPORT-29NOV2011rev2.docx 