[Rt4-whois] Recommendations and general update

[Emily Taylor]

Hi Lynn

Delighted to have you online, and thanks for joining so early.  Please
press on.  I'll be sending out a marked up version of the recommendations
(showing the source - the best of my abilities) within the hour.
The table of contents is excellent, and very helpful for the reader.

Please would you take a careful look at the following:

1/ We discussed by e-mail last night the possibility of shifting some of
the content from the Consumer Research chapter into an appendix. Could you
have a look at this, and make suggestions?
2/ Please would you give careful thought to the positioning of the Consumer
Trust chapter.  Peter, Kathy and I were thinking it would go very well
after the Chapter 7 (what law enforcement want) and before our findings
(Chapter 8 ) and recommendations (9).  I see that in your latest mark up
you have the chapter where it originally was.  I think this not such a good
position, because after it we immediately flip back into background stuff
like the history of how the policy developed, what the compliance team
does.  The consumer stuff I see as real meat and potatoes - good for the
analysis section.  I would appreciate your thoughts on this Lynn.


Kind regards

Emily

On 30 November 2011 12:20, <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:

> I'm back at my computer - my time zone is GMT -5 and it is morning here.
> Not sure whether to do any further editing or not so will stand by and be
> available to help.
>
> I did feel very encouraged that in just making administrative edits and
> removing the yellow highlighting, it was easier to see the remaining points
> of contention.
>
> Also felt that creating a Table of Contents is needed.
> Happy to help in any way to move this forward.
> Lynn
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Recommendations and general update
> From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.eu>
> Date: Wed, November 30, 2011 4:41 am
> To: rt4-whois at icann.org
>
> Hi all
>
> Thanks for your work overnight (or at least, my night).
>
> I'm trying to pull together the threads of the many e-mail messages that
> have passed in the last 12 hours or so.
>
>
> 1. Version control - this is proving a nightmare for everyone.  I am sorry
> that so many of you have been struggling with this.  I can see that we have
> had comments on the whole or part of the report from Bill, Susan, Peter,
> Lynn.  I understand that Kathy was unable to see Bill's edits, so rolled
> back to an earlier version.  There is also an incredibly annoying,
> persistent "comment" that is repeated about 100 times randomly throughout
> the document, and needs to be eliminated as it's confusing.
>
> *Action:  Alice, please would you circulate the latest copy of the Report
> to the list as soon as possible, getting rid of highlighting except where
> it indicates a major disagreement, and leaving in all the comments from
> Bill, Susan, Peter and Lynn, but removing that buggy one.
>
> *2. Recommendations - Peter noticed that the ambit of the privacy
> recommendations seems to have changed since Dakar, without an explanation
> of how or why that change was made.  Clearly, this will tend to reduce
> confidence, so my focus this morning will be to review and circulate a copy
> of the recommendations.  I'm assisted in this by Kathy's work yesterday.
> She and I have been puzzling over how to clean up/wordsmith/ etc the
> recommendations, while respecting the negotiated text.  This is a very
> difficult task.  There are also new recommendations on proxies, the one
> from Lutz on common interface, and one which I put in about the Whois Data
> Reminder Policy (from the compliance letter).
>
> *Action: I will review the latest draft recommendations, and compare with
> the Dakar text.  I will circulate a clean and marked up copy, with the
> latest versions of the recommendations, and an explanation for what has
> changed and why.
>
> *3. Deadline.  I'm not prepared to give up yet!  This is our draft
> report.  It is not our final version.  I will call it at 5pm UTC today.  I
> want us to make every effort to get this out when we said we would. I
> really believe we can do this.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Emily
> --
>
>
>
>
> *
> *
>
> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
> t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
> emily at emilytaylor.eu
>
> *www.etlaw.co.uk*
>
> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
> Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>


-- 




*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111130/b5482da7/attachment.html