[Rt4-whois] Recommendations - SOURCE EXPLANATION (2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Seth M Reiss]

Not sure, can someone direct me to the current proposal?

 

From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nettlefold, Peter
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:57 AM
To: 'susank at fb.com'; 'rt4-whois at icann.org'
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Recommendations - SOURCE EXPLANATION (2).doc [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

 

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Hi Susan and all,

Thanks again for all your hard work on this.

As you know, one of my main concerns with proxies is to have a clear chain of responsibilities. To me, ambiguity about this is a major contributor to the current problems.

Having just read the latest recommendations document, it places your proposal as a supplement to the Dakar proposal, and this got me thinking. 

My question is: is the intent of your proposal that the agent assumes all rights and responsibilities in all cases (as we discussed in Dakar), AND in cases where the agent is within the current contractual net, they ALSO assume additional responsibilities relating to revealing any other relationships they have entered into. I assume the intent is that these additional responsibilities do not undermine or confuse the clear chain we were hoping to achieve in the Dakar proposal?

Is this correct, or am I stretching this too far?

If it is correct, can any of our lawyers or others advise whether this sort of thing is possible - ie could we achieve both goals?

Cheers,

Peter

 

From: Susan Kawaguchi [mailto:susank at fb.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 03:58 AM
To: rt4-whois at icann.org <rt4-whois at icann.org> 
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Recommendations - SOURCE EXPLANATION (2).doc 
 

HI Emily, 

 

James and I had a quick phone call to discuss the proxy recommendation.   He made a great point that we should include in the recommendation reviewing the existing proxy practices so I have added the following point.   

1)      Review existing practices by reaching out to proxy providers and foster a discussion to develop, clarify and enhance the current processes 

 

Please see the whole recommendation incorporated in the attached document.  

 

Susan 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
copies of the original message. 

This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. 
MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111130/b9b46b72/attachment.html