From kathy at kathykleiman.com Mon Dec 5 03:33:41 2011 From: kathy at kathykleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4EDC3B95.4050601@kathykleiman.com> Hi Emily, I wanted to share that I think your edits are excellent, and particularly like the edits to Chapter 4. I never thought I would say it, but I think we are ready for launch. Best, Kathy > Hi all > > I attach a mark up showing my final edits to the Draft Report, which > we will be publishing on Monday. > > You can see my changes. They are mainly correction of typos, adding a > couple of footnote references, and making sure that we are using terms > consistently. I also split the report into three parts (Part I: Scope > and definitions; Part II - WHOIS Policy and implementation and Part > III - the extent to which WHOIS policy and its implementation are > effective in meeting stakeholder needs). I found that this made it > easier to see how the pieces of the jigsaw fit together. > > There are a couple of more substantive changes: > > 1. Recommendations - As agreed on the list, I have unhighlighted (ie > confirmed) the best practices recommendations re proxies, and inserted > the introductory text proposed by Susan and amended by me. > 2. Recommendations - given the late controversy on whether the > interface should be for all gTLDs or just thin ones, I have put in two > alternatives for public comment, as proposed by Peter, and have added > a sentence near the introductory text on proxies. > 3. Recommendations - Lutz's add on consumer outreach I have added into > the paragraph below where it was - I am unaware of any opposition to > this addition, or even when it was made, so shout if you have objections. > 4. Recommendations - A few days ago, given the discussion of the words > "registrar-operated" in recommendation 10, I proposed their deletion. > I heard no opposition, and have deleted them. > 5.The order of the chapter on implementation (which I wrote) I found > annoying, and not sufficiently clear because it has suffered from > being moved back and forth from the main report to the more detailed > letter in the appendix. I have therefore made a few changes there, > which are marked up. These should be uncontentious - the aim is to > explain what's going on rather than introduce substantive changes. > > Please give any final final edits to me and Alice/ circulated to the > list by the end of the weekend. > > Alice -- you will see that I've managed to muck up some of the > formatting (in particular I could not get the title for PART III to > appear on the same page as the next chapter heading, so gave up). > Please can you also update the table of contents. On Monday, if no > more comments have been made, please accept all the marked up changes, > and publish the draft report. > > I will also forward an outline of our proposed cover note/ request for > comment. > > Kind regards > > Emily > > -- > > > > > __ > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 . m: +44 > (0)7540 049 322 > emily at emilytaylor.eu > > *www.etlaw.co.uk * > > Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England > and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111204/dc1fbad7/attachment.html From m.yakushev at corp.mail.ru Mon Dec 5 03:42:34 2011 From: m.yakushev at corp.mail.ru (Mikhail Yakushev) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 03:42:34 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <71B38F372F86D940B9C644A99264FA313E7E26@M2EMBS1.mail.msk> Dear Emily, I thank you personally and congratulate all of us with this very good job (now seems to be {preliminarily} finalized). The latest changes are real great improvements. Rgds, Michael From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 5:28 PM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read Hi all I attach a mark up showing my final edits to the Draft Report, which we will be publishing on Monday. You can see my changes. They are mainly correction of typos, adding a couple of footnote references, and making sure that we are using terms consistently. I also split the report into three parts (Part I: Scope and definitions; Part II - WHOIS Policy and implementation and Part III - the extent to which WHOIS policy and its implementation are effective in meeting stakeholder needs). I found that this made it easier to see how the pieces of the jigsaw fit together. There are a couple of more substantive changes: 1. Recommendations - As agreed on the list, I have unhighlighted (ie confirmed) the best practices recommendations re proxies, and inserted the introductory text proposed by Susan and amended by me. 2. Recommendations - given the late controversy on whether the interface should be for all gTLDs or just thin ones, I have put in two alternatives for public comment, as proposed by Peter, and have added a sentence near the introductory text on proxies. 3. Recommendations - Lutz's add on consumer outreach I have added into the paragraph below where it was - I am unaware of any opposition to this addition, or even when it was made, so shout if you have objections. 4. Recommendations - A few days ago, given the discussion of the words "registrar-operated" in recommendation 10, I proposed their deletion. I heard no opposition, and have deleted them. 5.The order of the chapter on implementation (which I wrote) I found annoying, and not sufficiently clear because it has suffered from being moved back and forth from the main report to the more detailed letter in the appendix. I have therefore made a few changes there, which are marked up. These should be uncontentious - the aim is to explain what's going on rather than introduce substantive changes. Please give any final final edits to me and Alice/ circulated to the list by the end of the weekend. Alice -- you will see that I've managed to muck up some of the formatting (in particular I could not get the title for PART III to appear on the same page as the next chapter heading, so gave up). Please can you also update the table of contents. On Monday, if no more comments have been made, please accept all the marked up changes, and publish the draft report. I will also forward an outline of our proposed cover note/ request for comment. Kind regards Emily -- [Description: Image removed by sender.] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 * m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu www.etlaw.co.uk Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111205/3b907900/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ~WRD000.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 823 bytes Desc: ~WRD000.jpg Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111205/3b907900/WRD000.jpg From emily at emilytaylor.eu Mon Dec 5 08:45:16 2011 From: emily at emilytaylor.eu (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:45:16 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] In-Reply-To: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A333E32ACE1@EMB01.dept.gov.au> References: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A333E32ACE1@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Message-ID: Hi Peter Thanks for your comments. I think we all feel the same way! Thanks also for posing those questions, which I've been thinking about in my head, but haven't communicated to anyone. 1. We're planning a long public comment on this one. Basically, it will be open until the Costa Rica meeting closes. Denise told me that there is a new form of public comment, where people can comment on the comments, and I think we have time to do both of those before Costa Rica. Anyway, it means that it's out there for comment until the next ICANN meeting. 2. Yes, I think we should meet in Costa Rica, and I expect that we should try to schedule our meeting day for the Thursday (or some time *after* we have done our outreach, public comment sessions). We're aiming to schedule a call with the Board this month to introduce them to our draft report and findings, and we may try to reach out to others (GNSO Council??) in the same way during this period of public comment. 3. We will need some time to take in comments and review our draft. I think six weeks after the Costa Rica meeting should do it, putting final publication on or before 30 April 2012 - that's my proposal, anyway. Kind regards Emily On 4 December 2011 23:23, Nettlefold, Peter wrote: > Hi Emily and all,**** > > ** ** > > I am very impressed with the huge amount of work that has been done in the > past week - it has made my head spin (and my inbox explode) trying to keep > up!**** > > ** ** > > This being our draft, there are obviously some areas we will be revisiting > and continuing to discuss before we publish the final report, but I think > this draft clearly lays out the issues we have been grappling with, as well > as the solutions we have considered. There are some things I might like to > change if we had more time, but I expect we all feel like that, and my > overall feeling is one of relief at passing this over to the community for > comment!**** > > ** ** > > Looking forward, and I apologise if I have missed this, but do we have a > work plan/timeline to reach the final report? For example:**** > > ** ** > > **? **How long with our draft be out for public comment? **** > > **? **Will we be meeting in Costa Rica? Will this be to complete > the final report? **** > > **? **When do we anticipate the final report being published?**** > > ** ** > > Sorry for all the questions, and I?m sorry if I?ve missed this, but before > Christmas I have several planning and travel approval processes to go > through for next year, and WHOIS is an important part of that picture.**** > > ** ** > > Cheers,**** > > ** ** > > Peter**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] *On > Behalf Of *Susan Kawaguchi > *Sent:* Monday, 5 December 2011 9:11 AM > *To:* Emily Taylor; rt4-whois at icann.org > *Subject:* Re: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read**** > > ** ** > > Looks great! I have no revisions. **** > > ** ** > > It will be interesting to see the response by the community. **** > > ** ** > > *From:* rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] *On > Behalf Of *Emily Taylor > *Sent:* Saturday, December 03, 2011 6:28 AM > *To:* rt4-whois at icann.org > *Subject:* [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read**** > > ** ** > > Hi all > > I attach a mark up showing my final edits to the Draft Report, which we > will be publishing on Monday. > > You can see my changes. They are mainly correction of typos, adding a > couple of footnote references, and making sure that we are using terms > consistently. I also split the report into three parts (Part I: Scope and > definitions; Part II - WHOIS Policy and implementation and Part III - the > extent to which WHOIS policy and its implementation are effective in > meeting stakeholder needs). I found that this made it easier to see how > the pieces of the jigsaw fit together. > > There are a couple of more substantive changes: > > 1. Recommendations - As agreed on the list, I have unhighlighted (ie > confirmed) the best practices recommendations re proxies, and inserted the > introductory text proposed by Susan and amended by me. > 2. Recommendations - given the late controversy on whether the interface > should be for all gTLDs or just thin ones, I have put in two alternatives > for public comment, as proposed by Peter, and have added a sentence near > the introductory text on proxies. > 3. Recommendations - Lutz's add on consumer outreach I have added into the > paragraph below where it was - I am unaware of any opposition to this > addition, or even when it was made, so shout if you have objections. > 4. Recommendations - A few days ago, given the discussion of the words > "registrar-operated" in recommendation 10, I proposed their deletion. I > heard no opposition, and have deleted them. > 5.The order of the chapter on implementation (which I wrote) I found > annoying, and not sufficiently clear because it has suffered from being > moved back and forth from the main report to the more detailed letter in > the appendix. I have therefore made a few changes there, which are marked > up. These should be uncontentious - the aim is to explain what's going on > rather than introduce substantive changes. > > Please give any final final edits to me and Alice/ circulated to the list > by the end of the weekend. > > Alice -- you will see that I've managed to muck up some of the formatting > (in particular I could not get the title for PART III to appear on the same > page as the next chapter heading, so gave up). Please can you also update > the table of contents. On Monday, if no more comments have been made, > please accept all the marked up changes, and publish the draft report. > > I will also forward an outline of our proposed cover note/ request for > comment. > > Kind regards > > Emily > > -- > > > [image: Image removed by sender.]**** > > * > * > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 > emily at emilytaylor.eu > > *www.etlaw.co.uk* > > Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and > Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.**** > > ** ** > > > * > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy > all > copies of the original message. > > This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. > MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, > undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway > products please visit www.axway.com. > > * > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * > -- * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111205/4847278c/attachment.html From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Mon Dec 5 13:23:01 2011 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:23:01 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read Message-ID: <20111205062301.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.b6c85e14c9.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111205/875c6144/attachment.html From denise.michel at icann.org Mon Dec 5 18:02:19 2011 From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 10:02:19 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Draft Report Message-ID: Dear Emily and Team members: Congratulations on moving your draft report to the public comment phase. I've been following the evolution of your recommendations and while Staff has some questions, comments, suggested corrections, and additional information for the Team's consideration, we thought it best, given your publication target (and Staff's workload), to provide these during the public comment period. The information below is useful. You're probably way ahead of me on this, but just in case... I'd suggest you include in your posting note for the public comment forum information on the Team's Costa Rica plans and your expected schedule for producing the final report. Interested parties will want to know the steps and timing on finalizing the report. As always, please let me know if you need anything further from Staff. Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Emily Taylor wrote: > Hi Peter > > Thanks for your comments. I think we all feel the same way! > > Thanks also for posing those questions, which I've been thinking about in > my head, but haven't communicated to anyone. > > 1. We're planning a long public comment on this one. Basically, it will > be open until the Costa Rica meeting closes. Denise told me that there is > a new form of public comment, where people can comment on the comments, and > I think we have time to do both of those before Costa Rica. Anyway, it > means that it's out there for comment until the next ICANN meeting. > > 2. Yes, I think we should meet in Costa Rica, and I expect that we should > try to schedule our meeting day for the Thursday (or some time *after* we > have done our outreach, public comment sessions). We're aiming to schedule > a call with the Board this month to introduce them to our draft report and > findings, and we may try to reach out to others (GNSO Council??) in the > same way during this period of public comment. > > 3. We will need some time to take in comments and review our draft. I > think six weeks after the Costa Rica meeting should do it, putting final > publication on or before 30 April 2012 - that's my proposal, anyway. > > Kind regards > > Emily > > > > > On 4 December 2011 23:23, Nettlefold, Peter > wrote: > >> Hi Emily and all,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I am very impressed with the huge amount of work that has been done in >> the past week - it has made my head spin (and my inbox explode) trying to >> keep up!**** >> >> ** ** >> >> This being our draft, there are obviously some areas we will be >> revisiting and continuing to discuss before we publish the final report, >> but I think this draft clearly lays out the issues we have been grappling >> with, as well as the solutions we have considered. There are some things I >> might like to change if we had more time, but I expect we all feel like >> that, and my overall feeling is one of relief at passing this over to the >> community for comment!**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Looking forward, and I apologise if I have missed this, but do we have a >> work plan/timeline to reach the final report? For example:**** >> >> ** ** >> >> **? **How long with our draft be out for public comment? **** >> >> **? **Will we be meeting in Costa Rica? Will this be to complete >> the final report? **** >> >> **? **When do we anticipate the final report being published?**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Sorry for all the questions, and I?m sorry if I?ve missed this, but >> before Christmas I have several planning and travel approval processes to >> go through for next year, and WHOIS is an important part of that picture. >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Cheers,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Peter**** >> >> ** ** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] >> *On Behalf Of *Susan Kawaguchi >> *Sent:* Monday, 5 December 2011 9:11 AM >> *To:* Emily Taylor; rt4-whois at icann.org >> *Subject:* Re: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Looks great! I have no revisions. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> It will be interesting to see the response by the community. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] >> *On Behalf Of *Emily Taylor >> *Sent:* Saturday, December 03, 2011 6:28 AM >> *To:* rt4-whois at icann.org >> *Subject:* [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Hi all >> >> I attach a mark up showing my final edits to the Draft Report, which we >> will be publishing on Monday. >> >> You can see my changes. They are mainly correction of typos, adding a >> couple of footnote references, and making sure that we are using terms >> consistently. I also split the report into three parts (Part I: Scope and >> definitions; Part II - WHOIS Policy and implementation and Part III - the >> extent to which WHOIS policy and its implementation are effective in >> meeting stakeholder needs). I found that this made it easier to see how >> the pieces of the jigsaw fit together. >> >> There are a couple of more substantive changes: >> >> 1. Recommendations - As agreed on the list, I have unhighlighted (ie >> confirmed) the best practices recommendations re proxies, and inserted the >> introductory text proposed by Susan and amended by me. >> 2. Recommendations - given the late controversy on whether the interface >> should be for all gTLDs or just thin ones, I have put in two alternatives >> for public comment, as proposed by Peter, and have added a sentence near >> the introductory text on proxies. >> 3. Recommendations - Lutz's add on consumer outreach I have added into >> the paragraph below where it was - I am unaware of any opposition to this >> addition, or even when it was made, so shout if you have objections. >> 4. Recommendations - A few days ago, given the discussion of the words >> "registrar-operated" in recommendation 10, I proposed their deletion. I >> heard no opposition, and have deleted them. >> 5.The order of the chapter on implementation (which I wrote) I found >> annoying, and not sufficiently clear because it has suffered from being >> moved back and forth from the main report to the more detailed letter in >> the appendix. I have therefore made a few changes there, which are marked >> up. These should be uncontentious - the aim is to explain what's going on >> rather than introduce substantive changes. >> >> Please give any final final edits to me and Alice/ circulated to the list >> by the end of the weekend. >> >> Alice -- you will see that I've managed to muck up some of the formatting >> (in particular I could not get the title for PART III to appear on the same >> page as the next chapter heading, so gave up). Please can you also update >> the table of contents. On Monday, if no more comments have been made, >> please accept all the marked up changes, and publish the draft report. >> >> I will also forward an outline of our proposed cover note/ request for >> comment. >> >> Kind regards >> >> Emily >> >> -- >> >> >> [image: Image removed by sender.]**** >> >> * >> * >> >> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK >> t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 >> emily at emilytaylor.eu >> >> *www.etlaw.co.uk* >> >> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and >> Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> >> * >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> * >> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended >> recipient(s) >> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized >> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the >> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy >> all >> copies of the original message. >> >> This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. >> MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, >> undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway >> products please visit www.axway.com. >> >> * >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> * >> > > > > -- > > > > > > * > * > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 > emily at emilytaylor.eu > > *www.etlaw.co.uk* > > Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and > Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111205/32b8de42/attachment.html From susank at fb.com Mon Dec 5 22:08:18 2011 From: susank at fb.com (Susan Kawaguchi) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:08:18 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] In-Reply-To: References: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A333E32ACE1@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Message-ID: Hi Emily, I am concerned with the comment period and how it will intersect with gTld timing next year. We definitely need to allow the comment period to run through the end of February but I was hoping that it would end before the meeting started so that we could be prepared for the public comment sessions. I also think that we should deliver the final report before the publication of the new gTld applications which will be sometime in late April or early May. Just my thoughts. Susan From: Emily Taylor [mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 12:45 AM To: Nettlefold, Peter Cc: Susan Kawaguchi; rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Hi Peter Thanks for your comments. I think we all feel the same way! Thanks also for posing those questions, which I've been thinking about in my head, but haven't communicated to anyone. 1. We're planning a long public comment on this one. Basically, it will be open until the Costa Rica meeting closes. Denise told me that there is a new form of public comment, where people can comment on the comments, and I think we have time to do both of those before Costa Rica. Anyway, it means that it's out there for comment until the next ICANN meeting. 2. Yes, I think we should meet in Costa Rica, and I expect that we should try to schedule our meeting day for the Thursday (or some time after we have done our outreach, public comment sessions). We're aiming to schedule a call with the Board this month to introduce them to our draft report and findings, and we may try to reach out to others (GNSO Council??) in the same way during this period of public comment. 3. We will need some time to take in comments and review our draft. I think six weeks after the Costa Rica meeting should do it, putting final publication on or before 30 April 2012 - that's my proposal, anyway. Kind regards Emily On 4 December 2011 23:23, Nettlefold, Peter > wrote: Hi Emily and all, I am very impressed with the huge amount of work that has been done in the past week - it has made my head spin (and my inbox explode) trying to keep up! This being our draft, there are obviously some areas we will be revisiting and continuing to discuss before we publish the final report, but I think this draft clearly lays out the issues we have been grappling with, as well as the solutions we have considered. There are some things I might like to change if we had more time, but I expect we all feel like that, and my overall feeling is one of relief at passing this over to the community for comment! Looking forward, and I apologise if I have missed this, but do we have a work plan/timeline to reach the final report? For example: * How long with our draft be out for public comment? * Will we be meeting in Costa Rica? Will this be to complete the final report? * When do we anticipate the final report being published? Sorry for all the questions, and I'm sorry if I've missed this, but before Christmas I have several planning and travel approval processes to go through for next year, and WHOIS is an important part of that picture. Cheers, Peter From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi Sent: Monday, 5 December 2011 9:11 AM To: Emily Taylor; rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read Looks great! I have no revisions. It will be interesting to see the response by the community. From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 6:28 AM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] Final version - proof-read Hi all I attach a mark up showing my final edits to the Draft Report, which we will be publishing on Monday. You can see my changes. They are mainly correction of typos, adding a couple of footnote references, and making sure that we are using terms consistently. I also split the report into three parts (Part I: Scope and definitions; Part II - WHOIS Policy and implementation and Part III - the extent to which WHOIS policy and its implementation are effective in meeting stakeholder needs). I found that this made it easier to see how the pieces of the jigsaw fit together. There are a couple of more substantive changes: 1. Recommendations - As agreed on the list, I have unhighlighted (ie confirmed) the best practices recommendations re proxies, and inserted the introductory text proposed by Susan and amended by me. 2. Recommendations - given the late controversy on whether the interface should be for all gTLDs or just thin ones, I have put in two alternatives for public comment, as proposed by Peter, and have added a sentence near the introductory text on proxies. 3. Recommendations - Lutz's add on consumer outreach I have added into the paragraph below where it was - I am unaware of any opposition to this addition, or even when it was made, so shout if you have objections. 4. Recommendations - A few days ago, given the discussion of the words "registrar-operated" in recommendation 10, I proposed their deletion. I heard no opposition, and have deleted them. 5.The order of the chapter on implementation (which I wrote) I found annoying, and not sufficiently clear because it has suffered from being moved back and forth from the main report to the more detailed letter in the appendix. I have therefore made a few changes there, which are marked up. These should be uncontentious - the aim is to explain what's going on rather than introduce substantive changes. Please give any final final edits to me and Alice/ circulated to the list by the end of the weekend. Alice -- you will see that I've managed to muck up some of the formatting (in particular I could not get the title for PART III to appear on the same page as the next chapter heading, so gave up). Please can you also update the table of contents. On Monday, if no more comments have been made, please accept all the marked up changes, and publish the draft report. I will also forward an outline of our proposed cover note/ request for comment. Kind regards Emily -- Error! Filename not specified. 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 * m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu www.etlaw.co.uk Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 * m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu www.etlaw.co.uk Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111205/d2d5988a/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Tue Dec 6 10:10:33 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 02:10:33 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Message-ID: Dear Review Team Members, My warmest congratulations to you on publishing your draft report. The public comment period is now open. Please refer to the announcement and public comment box at: * http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-05dec11-en.htm * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05dec11-en.htm The hyperlink to the report is as follows: http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05dec11-en.pdf You will also find it attached to this email for your convenience (+ wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Draft+report) The next step for the Team is to finalize the Appendices (to be circulated by 12 December 2011). Appendices are available on the draft report wiki page at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Draft+report Note that I have pro-actively created a wiki page for your final report: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Final+Report Feel free to add any edits or ideas you may have for the final report on this page. As always, please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thanks, Very best regards Alice -- Alice Jansen Assistant, Organizational Reviews 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5 B-1040 Brussels Belgium Direct dial: +32 2 234 78 64 Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56 Skype: alice_jansen_icann -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111206/3e21d24f/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Publish - WHOIS Policy RT - Draft report - 5Dec2011.doc Type: application/x-msword Size: 551424 bytes Desc: Publish - WHOIS Policy RT - Draft report - 5Dec2011.doc Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111206/3e21d24f/Publish-WHOISPolicyRT-Draftreport-5Dec2011.doc From emily at emilytaylor.eu Tue Dec 6 18:39:51 2011 From: emily at emilytaylor.eu (Emily Taylor) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 18:39:51 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Video for the website? Message-ID: Hi Lynn Thanks for all your work on the draft report, and the consumer study. Do you remember that we discussed publishing one of the videos from the qual. study, showing people doing a WHOIS search? Did you make any progress with User Insight about that? I believe it would do so much more than the written word in conveying the difficulty that people have in finding this sort of information, and it's something that once you're "in" the industry, you sort of forget about. Kind regards Emily -- * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111206/80ff9421/attachment.html From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Tue Dec 6 20:15:05 2011 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:15:05 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] =?utf-8?q?Video_for_the_website=3F?= Message-ID: <20111206131505.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.5972a251f5.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111206/fab6b87f/attachment.html From lgoodendorf at versprite.com Tue Dec 6 19:40:52 2011 From: lgoodendorf at versprite.com (Lynn Goodendorf) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:40:52 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Video for the website? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0556BB5BB3ED614D9261441DC56B1AB50952C709@GQ-EXCH002.greenqube.local> Thanks Emily, I got caught up in the dialogue last week and neglected to check with User Insight. But will contact them right away. Kind regards, Lynn Lynn Goodendorf, CIPP, CISSP VP Data Privacy Services VerSprite - Navigate Beyond Risk (main)678.278.8312 | (direct) 404.333.3779 | (fax) 678.222.3401 www.versprite.com Twitter: @versprite ________________________________ From: Emily Taylor [emily at emilytaylor.eu] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:39 PM To: Lynn Goodendorf; lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Video for the website? Hi Lynn Thanks for all your work on the draft report, and the consumer study. Do you remember that we discussed publishing one of the videos from the qual. study, showing people doing a WHOIS search? Did you make any progress with User Insight about that? I believe it would do so much more than the written word in conveying the difficulty that people have in finding this sort of information, and it's something that once you're "in" the industry, you sort of forget about. Kind regards Emily -- [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu www.etlaw.co.uk Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111206/536e4710/attachment.html From bill.smith at paypal-inc.com Tue Dec 6 23:57:56 2011 From: bill.smith at paypal-inc.com (Smith, Bill) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:57:56 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <475D2C18-657B-4FF2-AAD9-86E33FA5791F@paypal.com> Here's a "review" for those who may not have seen it: http://news.hostexploit.com/hosts-and-registrars-news/5024-whois-is-broken-review-team-concludes.html On Dec 6, 2011, at 2:10 AM, Alice Jansen wrote: Dear Review Team Members, My warmest congratulations to you on publishing your draft report. The public comment period is now open. Please refer to the announcement and public comment box at: * http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-05dec11-en.htm * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05dec11-en.htm The hyperlink to the report is as follows: http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05dec11-en.pdf You will also find it attached to this email for your convenience (+ wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Draft+report) The next step for the Team is to finalize the Appendices (to be circulated by 12 December 2011). Appendices are available on the draft report wiki page at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Draft+report Note that I have pro-actively created a wiki page for your final report: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Final+Report Feel free to add any edits or ideas you may have for the final report on this page. As always, please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thanks, Very best regards Alice -- Alice Jansen Assistant, Organizational Reviews 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5 B-1040 Brussels Belgium Direct dial: +32 2 234 78 64 Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56 Skype: alice_jansen_icann _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From seth.reiss at lex-ip.com Wed Dec 7 01:49:43 2011 From: seth.reiss at lex-ip.com (Seth M Reiss) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:49:43 -1000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN In-Reply-To: <475D2C18-657B-4FF2-AAD9-86E33FA5791F@paypal.com> References: <475D2C18-657B-4FF2-AAD9-86E33FA5791F@paypal.com> Message-ID: <00f301ccb482$7e434df0$7ac9e9d0$@reiss@lex-ip.com> Makes us sound reasonable intelligent at least. -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Smith, Bill Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:58 PM To: Alice Jansen Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Here's a "review" for those who may not have seen it: http://news.hostexploit.com/hosts-and-registrars-news/5024-whois-is-broken-r eview-team-concludes.html On Dec 6, 2011, at 2:10 AM, Alice Jansen wrote: Dear Review Team Members, My warmest congratulations to you on publishing your draft report. The public comment period is now open. Please refer to the announcement and public comment box at: * http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-05dec11-en.htm * http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05dec11-e n.htm The hyperlink to the report is as follows: http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05de c11-en.pdf You will also find it attached to this email for your convenience (+ wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Draft+report) The next step for the Team is to finalize the Appendices (to be circulated by 12 December 2011). Appendices are available on the draft report wiki page at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Draft+report Note that I have pro-actively created a wiki page for your final report: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Final+Report Feel free to add any edits or ideas you may have for the final report on this page. As always, please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thanks, Very best regards Alice -- Alice Jansen Assistant, Organizational Reviews 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5 B-1040 Brussels Belgium Direct dial: +32 2 234 78 64 Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56 Skype: alice_jansen_icann _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From emily at emilytaylor.eu Wed Dec 7 09:23:04 2011 From: emily at emilytaylor.eu (Emily Taylor) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:23:04 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN In-Reply-To: <7BB2C128-A2C4-4791-BACF-B4930506169B@auda.org.au> References: <7BB2C128-A2C4-4791-BACF-B4930506169B@auda.org.au> Message-ID: FYI - It was me who put in "incentivize", I'm sure ;-) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Disspain Chris Date: 7 December 2011 02:18 Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN To: Emily Taylor Hail Emily and the whole WHOIS Review Team. Excellent work. Great report. Useful and challenging recommendations. Well done. Only downside is the use of the 'word' incentivize?.aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheers, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/4974a13f/attachment.html From emily at emilytaylor.eu Wed Dec 7 09:30:04 2011 From: emily at emilytaylor.eu (Emily Taylor) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:30:04 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Video for the website? In-Reply-To: <20111206131505.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.5972a251f5.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> References: <20111206131505.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.5972a251f5.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: Hi Lynn Thanks for your reply. I wouldn't like to give up just yet. Could you ask them how much money they think it would cost, and then we can take it from there. Thanks Emily On 6 December 2011 20:15, wrote: > Hi Emily, > I just spoke to the User Insight Project Manager, Jonathan Yardley. > > In order to make any of the video material available publicly, they would > have to go back and get written > agreement from participants. They have done this for another client but > the participants asked for additional compensation. My sense is that ICANN > probably would not be willing to fund that. > > However, Jonathan is setting up a new password and access to the video > material that can be used on a restricted basis for the ICANN Board as well > as members of our project team. We just have to make sure everyone > understands it cannot be posted on the ICANN website or made publicly > available in some other way. > Kind regards, > Lynn > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: Video for the website? > From: Lynn Goodendorf > Date: Tue, December 06, 2011 2:40 pm > To: Emily Taylor , > "lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com" > Cc: "rt4-whois at icann.org" > > Thanks Emily, > I got caught up in the dialogue last week and neglected to check with User > Insight. > But will contact them right away. > Kind regards, > Lynn > > Lynn Goodendorf, CIPP, CISSP > VP Data Privacy Services > *VerSprite* - Navigate Beyond Risk > (main)678.278.8312 | (direct) 404.333.3779 | (fax) 678.222.3401 > www.versprite.com > Twitter: @versprite > ------------------------------ > *From:* Emily Taylor [emily at emilytaylor.eu] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:39 PM > *To:* Lynn Goodendorf; lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com > *Cc:* rt4-whois at icann.org > *Subject:* Video for the website? > > Hi Lynn > > Thanks for all your work on the draft report, and the consumer study. > > Do you remember that we discussed publishing one of the videos from the > qual. study, showing people doing a WHOIS search? Did you make any > progress with User Insight about that? I believe it would do so much more > than the written word in conveying the difficulty that people have in > finding this sort of information, and it's something that once you're "in" > the industry, you sort of forget about. > > Kind regards > > Emily > -- > > > > > * > * > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 > emily at emilytaylor.eu > > *www.etlaw.co.uk* > > Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and > Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. > > -- * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/0c4949e9/attachment.html From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Wed Dec 7 12:45:28 2011 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:45:28 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Video for the website? In-Reply-To: References: <20111206131505.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.5972a251f5.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <179359450-1323261930-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-489611334-@b11.c9.bise6.blackberry> Will do. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Emily Taylor Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:30:04 To: Cc: Lynn Goodendorf; rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: Video for the website? Hi Lynn Thanks for your reply. I wouldn't like to give up just yet. Could you ask them how much money they think it would cost, and then we can take it from there. Thanks Emily On 6 December 2011 20:15, wrote: > Hi Emily, > I just spoke to the User Insight Project Manager, Jonathan Yardley. > > In order to make any of the video material available publicly, they would > have to go back and get written > agreement from participants. They have done this for another client but > the participants asked for additional compensation. My sense is that ICANN > probably would not be willing to fund that. > > However, Jonathan is setting up a new password and access to the video > material that can be used on a restricted basis for the ICANN Board as well > as members of our project team. We just have to make sure everyone > understands it cannot be posted on the ICANN website or made publicly > available in some other way. > Kind regards, > Lynn > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: Video for the website? > From: Lynn Goodendorf > Date: Tue, December 06, 2011 2:40 pm > To: Emily Taylor , > "lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com" > Cc: "rt4-whois at icann.org" > > Thanks Emily, > I got caught up in the dialogue last week and neglected to check with User > Insight. > But will contact them right away. > Kind regards, > Lynn > > Lynn Goodendorf, CIPP, CISSP > VP Data Privacy Services > *VerSprite* - Navigate Beyond Risk > (main)678.278.8312 | (direct) 404.333.3779 | (fax) 678.222.3401 > www.versprite.com > Twitter: @versprite > ------------------------------ > *From:* Emily Taylor [emily at emilytaylor.eu] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:39 PM > *To:* Lynn Goodendorf; lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com > *Cc:* rt4-whois at icann.org > *Subject:* Video for the website? > > Hi Lynn > > Thanks for all your work on the draft report, and the consumer study. > > Do you remember that we discussed publishing one of the videos from the > qual. study, showing people doing a WHOIS search? Did you make any > progress with User Insight about that? I believe it would do so much more > than the written word in conveying the difficulty that people have in > finding this sort of information, and it's something that once you're "in" > the industry, you sort of forget about. > > Kind regards > > Emily > -- > > > > > * > * > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 > emily at emilytaylor.eu > > *www.etlaw.co.uk* > > Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and > Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. > > -- * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/15a43d2d/attachment.html From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Wed Dec 7 16:15:09 2011 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:15:09 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Message-ID: <20111207091509.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.c55eda1887.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/29f31a89/attachment.html From jbladel at godaddy.com Wed Dec 7 16:42:33 2011 From: jbladel at godaddy.com (James M. Bladel) Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:42:33 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Message-ID: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/e8059bb3/attachment.html From bill.smith at paypal-inc.com Wed Dec 7 18:50:34 2011 From: bill.smith at paypal-inc.com (Smith, Bill) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:50:34 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN In-Reply-To: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> References: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> Message-ID: Emily couldn't have written it. If she had, it would have had a "s" instead of a "z". On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:43 AM, "James M. Bladel" > wrote: I'm not sure that's a word in any language, or any variant of English. But that's never stopped me from using it! J. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 10:15 am To: "Emily Taylor" >, rt4-whois at icann.org We have to chuckle over that and chalk it up to our multi-lingual, globally diverse project team! Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: Emily Taylor > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 4:23 am To: rt4-whois at icann.org FYI - It was me who put in "incentivize", I'm sure ;-) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Disspain Chris > Date: 7 December 2011 02:18 Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN To: Emily Taylor > Hail Emily and the whole WHOIS Review Team. Excellent work. Great report. Useful and challenging recommendations. Well done. Only downside is the use of the 'word' incentivize?.aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheers, Chris ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From susank at fb.com Wed Dec 7 18:52:04 2011 From: susank at fb.com (Susan Kawaguchi) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:52:04 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN In-Reply-To: References: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> Message-ID: Yeah I am wondering if it was me... -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Smith, Bill Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:51 AM To: James M. Bladel Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Emily couldn't have written it. If she had, it would have had a "s" instead of a "z". On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:43 AM, "James M. Bladel" > wrote: I'm not sure that's a word in any language, or any variant of English. But that's never stopped me from using it! J. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 10:15 am To: "Emily Taylor" >, rt4-whois at icann.org We have to chuckle over that and chalk it up to our multi-lingual, globally diverse project team! Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: Emily Taylor > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 4:23 am To: rt4-whois at icann.org FYI - It was me who put in "incentivize", I'm sure ;-) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Disspain Chris > Date: 7 December 2011 02:18 Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN To: Emily Taylor > Hail Emily and the whole WHOIS Review Team. Excellent work. Great report. Useful and challenging recommendations. Well done. Only downside is the use of the 'word' incentivize?.aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheers, Chris ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From lgoodendorf at versprite.com Wed Dec 7 18:52:38 2011 From: lgoodendorf at versprite.com (Lynn Goodendorf) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:52:38 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN In-Reply-To: References: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net>, Message-ID: <0556BB5BB3ED614D9261441DC56B1AB50952C896@GQ-EXCH002.greenqube.local> so true! it had to be an American ________________________________________ From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of Smith, Bill [bill.smith at paypal-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:50 PM To: James M. Bladel Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Emily couldn't have written it. If she had, it would have had a "s" instead of a "z". On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:43 AM, "James M. Bladel" > wrote: I'm not sure that's a word in any language, or any variant of English. But that's never stopped me from using it! J. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 10:15 am To: "Emily Taylor" >, rt4-whois at icann.org We have to chuckle over that and chalk it up to our multi-lingual, globally diverse project team! Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: Emily Taylor > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 4:23 am To: rt4-whois at icann.org FYI - It was me who put in "incentivize", I'm sure ;-) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Disspain Chris > Date: 7 December 2011 02:18 Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN To: Emily Taylor > Hail Emily and the whole WHOIS Review Team. Excellent work. Great report. Useful and challenging recommendations. Well done. Only downside is the use of the 'word' incentivize?.aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheers, Chris ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From omar at kaminski.adv.br Wed Dec 7 19:26:51 2011 From: omar at kaminski.adv.br (Omar Kaminski) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 17:26:51 -0200 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN In-Reply-To: <0556BB5BB3ED614D9261441DC56B1AB50952C896@GQ-EXCH002.greenqube.local> References: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> <0556BB5BB3ED614D9261441DC56B1AB50952C896@GQ-EXCH002.greenqube.local> Message-ID: How about disembarkation? Sounds funny even in pt-br :) Omar 2011/12/7 Lynn Goodendorf : > so true! it had to be an American > > ________________________________________ > From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of Smith, Bill [bill.smith at paypal-inc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:50 PM > To: James M. Bladel > Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org > Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment ?NOW ? ? OPEN > > Emily couldn't have written it. If she had, it would have had a "s" instead of a "z". > > On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:43 AM, "James M. Bladel" > wrote: > > I'm not sure that's a word in any language, or any variant of English. > > But that's never stopped me from using it! > > J. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment > NOW OPEN > From: > > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 10:15 am > To: "Emily Taylor" >, rt4-whois at icann.org > > We have to chuckle over that and chalk it up to our multi-lingual, globally diverse project team! > Lynn > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW > OPEN > From: Emily Taylor > > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 4:23 am > To: rt4-whois at icann.org > > FYI - > > It was me who put in "incentivize", I'm sure ;-) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Disspain Chris > > Date: 7 December 2011 02:18 > Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN > To: Emily Taylor > > > > Hail Emily and the whole WHOIS Review Team. Excellent work. Great report. Useful and challenging recommendations. Well done. > > Only downside is the use of the 'word' incentivize?.aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh > > Cheers, > Chris > From emily at emilytaylor.eu Wed Dec 7 20:53:49 2011 From: emily at emilytaylor.eu (Emily Taylor) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 20:53:49 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN In-Reply-To: <0556BB5BB3ED614D9261441DC56B1AB50952C896@GQ-EXCH002.greenqube.local> References: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> <0556BB5BB3ED614D9261441DC56B1AB50952C896@GQ-EXCH002.greenqube.local> Message-ID: I have one word to say to you all. Autocorrect. On 7 December 2011 18:52, Lynn Goodendorf wrote: > so true! it had to be an American > > ________________________________________ > From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] on behalf > of Smith, Bill [bill.smith at paypal-inc.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:50 PM > To: James M. Bladel > Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org > Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment > NOW OPEN > > Emily couldn't have written it. If she had, it would have had a "s" > instead of a "z". > > On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:43 AM, "James M. Bladel" > wrote: > > I'm not sure that's a word in any language, or any variant of English. > > But that's never stopped me from using it! > > J. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment > NOW OPEN > From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com>> > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 10:15 am > To: "Emily Taylor" >, > rt4-whois at icann.org > > We have to chuckle over that and chalk it up to our multi-lingual, > globally diverse project team! > Lynn > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW > OPEN > From: Emily Taylor > > Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 4:23 am > To: rt4-whois at icann.org > > FYI - > > It was me who put in "incentivize", I'm sure ;-) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Disspain Chris > > Date: 7 December 2011 02:18 > Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN > To: Emily Taylor > > > > Hail Emily and the whole WHOIS Review Team. Excellent work. Great report. > Useful and challenging recommendations. Well done. > > Only downside is the use of the 'word' > incentivize?.aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh > > Cheers, > Chris > > > ________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > ________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > -- * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/ed33049a/attachment.html From susank at fb.com Wed Dec 7 21:25:14 2011 From: susank at fb.com (Susan Kawaguchi) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 21:25:14 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN In-Reply-To: References: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> <0556BB5BB3ED614D9261441DC56B1AB50952C896@GQ-EXCH002.greenqube.local>, Message-ID: <325D1AC1-EE3C-4A6B-AE2D-E176189FF69E@fb.com> Well at least intestinally did noy make it into the published report! Sent from my iPhone On Dec 7, 2011, at 12:54 PM, "Emily Taylor" > wrote: I have one word to say to you all. Autocorrect. On 7 December 2011 18:52, Lynn Goodendorf <lgoodendorf at versprite.com> wrote: so true! it had to be an American ________________________________________ From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of Smith, Bill [bill.smith at paypal-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:50 PM To: James M. Bladel Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Emily couldn't have written it. If she had, it would have had a "s" instead of a "z". On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:43 AM, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.comjbladel at godaddy.com>> wrote: I'm not sure that's a word in any language, or any variant of English. But that's never stopped me from using it! J. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: <lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.comlynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com>> Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 10:15 am To: "Emily Taylor" <emily at emilytaylor.euemily at emilytaylor.eu>>, rt4-whois at icann.orgrt4-whois at icann.org> We have to chuckle over that and chalk it up to our multi-lingual, globally diverse project team! Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.euemily at emilytaylor.eu>> Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 4:23 am To: rt4-whois at icann.orgrt4-whois at icann.org> FYI - It was me who put in "incentivize", I'm sure ;-) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Disspain Chris <ceo at auda.org.auceo at auda.org.au>> Date: 7 December 2011 02:18 Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN To: Emily Taylor <emily at emilytaylor.euemily at emilytaylor.eu>> Hail Emily and the whole WHOIS Review Team. Excellent work. Great report. Useful and challenging recommendations. Well done. Only downside is the use of the 'word' incentivize?.aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheers, Chris ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.orgRt4-whois at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.orgRt4-whois at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.orgRt4-whois at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -- [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu www.etlaw.co.uk Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/c3d67bad/attachment.html From denise.michel at icann.org Wed Dec 7 22:05:52 2011 From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 14:05:52 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Conference call briefing for ICANN's Board Message-ID: Dear Team members, Diane Schroeder, Director of Board Support, will be working with Alice to schedule your conference call briefing for interested Board members. Board Members' December schedules apparently don't look promising, but rest assured it will be scheduled in the near future to maximize Board members' participation. Alice will keep you posted. Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/728dd925/attachment.html From Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au Wed Dec 7 22:31:24 2011 From: Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au (Nettlefold, Peter) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:31:24 +1100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] In-Reply-To: <325D1AC1-EE3C-4A6B-AE2D-E176189FF69E@fb.com> References: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> <0556BB5BB3ED614D9261441DC56B1AB50952C896@GQ-EXCH002.greenqube.local>, <325D1AC1-EE3C-4A6B-AE2D-E176189FF69E@fb.com> Message-ID: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A333E3CCAB4@EMB01.dept.gov.au> 'noy' !? I think we have our culprit! :) From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi Sent: Thursday, 8 December 2011 8:25 AM To: Emily Taylor Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Well at least intestinally did noy make it into the published report! Sent from my iPhone On Dec 7, 2011, at 12:54 PM, "Emily Taylor" > wrote: I have one word to say to you all. Autocorrect. On 7 December 2011 18:52, Lynn Goodendorf > wrote: so true! it had to be an American ________________________________________ From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of Smith, Bill [bill.smith at paypal-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:50 PM To: James M. Bladel Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Emily couldn't have written it. If she had, it would have had a "s" instead of a "z". On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:43 AM, "James M. Bladel" >> wrote: I'm not sure that's a word in any language, or any variant of English. But that's never stopped me from using it! J. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: >> Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 10:15 am To: "Emily Taylor" >>, rt4-whois at icann.org> We have to chuckle over that and chalk it up to our multi-lingual, globally diverse project team! Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: Emily Taylor >> Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 4:23 am To: rt4-whois at icann.org> FYI - It was me who put in "incentivize", I'm sure ;-) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Disspain Chris >> Date: 7 December 2011 02:18 Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN To: Emily Taylor >> Hail Emily and the whole WHOIS Review Team. Excellent work. Great report. Useful and challenging recommendations. Well done. Only downside is the use of the 'word' incentivize....aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheers, Chris ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -- [cid:~WRD169.jpg] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 * m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu www.etlaw.co.uk Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111208/0a98c84b/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ~WRD169.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 823 bytes Desc: ~WRD169.jpg Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111208/0a98c84b/WRD169.jpg From susank at fb.com Wed Dec 7 22:32:42 2011 From: susank at fb.com (Susan Kawaguchi) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:32:42 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] In-Reply-To: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A333E3CCAB4@EMB01.dept.gov.au> References: <20111207094233.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.10d7b1c6d4.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> <0556BB5BB3ED614D9261441DC56B1AB50952C896@GQ-EXCH002.greenqube.local>, <325D1AC1-EE3C-4A6B-AE2D-E176189FF69E@fb.com> <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A333E3CCAB4@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Message-ID: Hey, that was my iPhone's fault! From: Nettlefold, Peter [mailto:Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 2:31 PM To: Susan Kawaguchi; Emily Taylor Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] 'noy' !? I think we have our culprit! :) From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi Sent: Thursday, 8 December 2011 8:25 AM To: Emily Taylor Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Well at least intestinally did noy make it into the published report! Sent from my iPhone On Dec 7, 2011, at 12:54 PM, "Emily Taylor" > wrote: I have one word to say to you all. Autocorrect. On 7 December 2011 18:52, Lynn Goodendorf > wrote: so true! it had to be an American ________________________________________ From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of Smith, Bill [bill.smith at paypal-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:50 PM To: James M. Bladel Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN Emily couldn't have written it. If she had, it would have had a "s" instead of a "z". On Dec 7, 2011, at 11:43 AM, "James M. Bladel" >> wrote: I'm not sure that's a word in any language, or any variant of English. But that's never stopped me from using it! J. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: >> Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 10:15 am To: "Emily Taylor" >>, rt4-whois at icann.org> We have to chuckle over that and chalk it up to our multi-lingual, globally diverse project team! Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN From: Emily Taylor >> Date: Wed, December 07, 2011 4:23 am To: rt4-whois at icann.org> FYI - It was me who put in "incentivize", I'm sure ;-) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Disspain Chris >> Date: 7 December 2011 02:18 Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Draft report NOW PUBLIC - Public comment NOW OPEN To: Emily Taylor >> Hail Emily and the whole WHOIS Review Team. Excellent work. Great report. Useful and challenging recommendations. Well done. Only downside is the use of the 'word' incentivize....aaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheers, Chris ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -- [Image removed by sender.] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 * m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu www.etlaw.co.uk Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/ed4734ce/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 823 bytes Desc: image001.jpg Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111207/ed4734ce/image001.jpg From emily at emilytaylor.eu Thu Dec 8 08:52:33 2011 From: emily at emilytaylor.eu (Emily Taylor) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 08:52:33 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Conference call briefing for ICANN's Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Denise On 7 December 2011 22:05, Denise Michel wrote: > Dear Team members, > > Diane Schroeder, Director of Board Support, will be working with Alice to > schedule your conference call briefing for interested Board members. Board > Members' December schedules apparently don't look promising, but rest > assured it will be scheduled in the near future to maximize Board members' > participation. > > Alice will keep you posted. > > Regards, > Denise > > Denise Michel > ICANN > Advisor to the President & CEO > denise.michel at icann.org > +1.408.429.3072 mobile > +1.310.578.8632 direct > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > > -- * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 ? m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily at emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111208/65736edd/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Fri Dec 9 08:54:31 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 00:54:31 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] COSTA RICA MEETING - please confirm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear Review Team Members, The next ICANN meeting will be held in Costa Rica - 11?16 March 2011. Information on this event (venue, hotel, health, visa etc) may be found on the ICANN website at: http://costarica43.icann.org/ With a view to preparing for this meeting, please let me know by Wednesday, 14 December whether: * you are attending the meeting (Yes/No) * you need travel support (Yes/No) If you do require travel support, please provide us with your desired arrival & departure dates. Once this information submitted, ICANN Constituency Travel will contact you directly to book your trip. * FLIGHTS: Please book your flights through ICANN Constituency Travel. Should you wish to book business or economy premium tickets, please know that an allowance will be granted to you according to your geographic region. * ACCOMMODATION: ICANN Constituency Travel will book your hotel room ? please do not book via the website. This is the safe way to have ICANN cover your lodging needs. We look forward to receiving your details. In the meantime, do feel free to contact us should you have questions or concerns. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Alice -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111209/eed2b245/attachment.html From susank at fb.com Fri Dec 9 19:01:45 2011 From: susank at fb.com (Susan Kawaguchi) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 19:01:45 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] COSTA RICA MEETING - please confirm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Alice, I will be attending the Costa Rica meeting. I have booked my stay at the Marriott. After the Senegal fiasco I wanted to be sure I had a safe and secure hotel so I will pay upfront for the hotel room and turn it in for reimbursement after the meeting. I am traveling to Costa Rica early so will book my own airline ticket. I will rely on the allowance ICANN provides. Best regards, Susan From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 12:55 AM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] COSTA RICA MEETING - please confirm Importance: High Dear Review Team Members, The next ICANN meeting will be held in Costa Rica - 11-16 March 2011. Information on this event (venue, hotel, health, visa etc) may be found on the ICANN website at: http://costarica43.icann.org/ With a view to preparing for this meeting, please let me know by Wednesday, 14 December whether: * you are attending the meeting (Yes/No) * you need travel support (Yes/No) If you do require travel support, please provide us with your desired arrival & departure dates. Once this information submitted, ICANN Constituency Travel will contact you directly to book your trip. * FLIGHTS: Please book your flights through ICANN Constituency Travel. Should you wish to book business or economy premium tickets, please know that an allowance will be granted to you according to your geographic region. * ACCOMMODATION: ICANN Constituency Travel will book your hotel room - please do not book via the website. This is the safe way to have ICANN cover your lodging needs. We look forward to receiving your details. In the meantime, do feel free to contact us should you have questions or concerns. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Alice -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111209/97bec779/attachment.html From bill.smith at paypal-inc.com Fri Dec 9 20:58:03 2011 From: bill.smith at paypal-inc.com (Smith, Bill) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:58:03 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] COSTA RICA MEETING - please confirm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Alice, I have also booked my own room, at a nearby hotel. Hopefully it will be better than Les Maladies. I will also book my own flights to accommodate my schedule. I will be requesting reimbursement. Regards, Bill On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Susan Kawaguchi wrote: Hi Alice, I will be attending the Costa Rica meeting. I have booked my stay at the Marriott. After the Senegal fiasco I wanted to be sure I had a safe and secure hotel so I will pay upfront for the hotel room and turn it in for reimbursement after the meeting. I am traveling to Costa Rica early so will book my own airline ticket. I will rely on the allowance ICANN provides. Best regards, Susan From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 12:55 AM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] COSTA RICA MEETING - please confirm Importance: High Dear Review Team Members, The next ICANN meeting will be held in Costa Rica - 11?16 March 2011. Information on this event (venue, hotel, health, visa etc) may be found on the ICANN website at: http://costarica43.icann.org/ With a view to preparing for this meeting, please let me know by Wednesday, 14 December whether: * you are attending the meeting (Yes/No) * you need travel support (Yes/No) If you do require travel support, please provide us with your desired arrival & departure dates. Once this information submitted, ICANN Constituency Travel will contact you directly to book your trip. * FLIGHTS: Please book your flights through ICANN Constituency Travel. Should you wish to book business or economy premium tickets, please know that an allowance will be granted to you according to your geographic region. * ACCOMMODATION: ICANN Constituency Travel will book your hotel room ? please do not book via the website. This is the safe way to have ICANN cover your lodging needs. We look forward to receiving your details. In the meantime, do feel free to contact us should you have questions or concerns. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au Sun Dec 11 22:56:26 2011 From: Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au (Nettlefold, Peter) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:56:26 +1100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] COSTA RICA MEETING - please confirm [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A333E41573B@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Hi Alice, I am also planning to attend Costa Rica. I have booked a room at the Marriott, and have also booked airfares. In terms of travel support, I will be seeking the airfare reimbursement allowance from ICANN. Please let me know if you need anything else from me at this stage. Cheers, Peter From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi Sent: Saturday, 10 December 2011 6:02 AM To: Alice Jansen; rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] COSTA RICA MEETING - please confirm Hi Alice, I will be attending the Costa Rica meeting. I have booked my stay at the Marriott. After the Senegal fiasco I wanted to be sure I had a safe and secure hotel so I will pay upfront for the hotel room and turn it in for reimbursement after the meeting. I am traveling to Costa Rica early so will book my own airline ticket. I will rely on the allowance ICANN provides. Best regards, Susan From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 12:55 AM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] COSTA RICA MEETING - please confirm Importance: High Dear Review Team Members, The next ICANN meeting will be held in Costa Rica - 11-16 March 2011. Information on this event (venue, hotel, health, visa etc) may be found on the ICANN website at: http://costarica43.icann.org/ With a view to preparing for this meeting, please let me know by Wednesday, 14 December whether: * you are attending the meeting (Yes/No) * you need travel support (Yes/No) If you do require travel support, please provide us with your desired arrival & departure dates. Once this information submitted, ICANN Constituency Travel will contact you directly to book your trip. * FLIGHTS: Please book your flights through ICANN Constituency Travel. Should you wish to book business or economy premium tickets, please know that an allowance will be granted to you according to your geographic region. * ACCOMMODATION: ICANN Constituency Travel will book your hotel room - please do not book via the website. This is the safe way to have ICANN cover your lodging needs. We look forward to receiving your details. In the meantime, do feel free to contact us should you have questions or concerns. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Alice ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20111212/92ec5a57/attachment.html