[Rt4-whois] Fwd: GNSO Council meeting - Whois RT update -Thursday 19 January at 11:00 UTC
Emily Taylor
emily at emilytaylor.eu
Tue Jan 17 08:33:30 UTC 2012
FYI
Please join if you can. I shall be on a Eurostar train, and so will
disappear for about 20 minutes during the journey. So, if any of you can
make it (I know it's an early hour for our US colleagues), that would be
great.
Kind regards
Emily
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
Date: 16 January 2012 23:00
Subject: GNSO Council meeting - Whois RT update -Thursday 19 January at
11:00 UTC
To: "emily at emilytaylor.eu" <emily at emilytaylor.eu>
Cc: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder at indom.com>, "gnso-secs at icann.org"
<gnso-secs at icann.org>
Dear Emily,****
** **
Following on from Stéphane van Gelder’s email, we would welcome you on the
GNSO Council call on Thursday 19 January at 11:00 UTC.****
The update on the Whois review team that you will be providing has been
placed third on the agenda so will probably be within the first 15 minutes
of the call. However, if you would prefer it at another time, please let us
know. The Council meeting usually lasts for two hours. The full agenda is
added below as well as the relevant urls.
****
The dial in numbers for the UK are:****
UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 **
**
UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 **
**
UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 **
**
UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 **
**
UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 **
**
Pass code: Council****
** **
However if you would prefer the operator to call you just before your item
comes up, please provide us with your telephone number.****
** **
Thank you very much for your willingness to participate.****
We look forward to hearing you.****
Kind regards,****
** **
Glen****
** **
*Item 3: Update Whois Review Team (RT) (10 minutes)
*Recent events like the recent National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) letter
http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/strickling-to-crocker-03jan12-en.pdf
show that Whois remains very much in the spotlight. It therefore appears
useful for the Council to have an update from the Whois RT so that the
Council has a clearer idea of what potential policy development it might be
called to work on in the near future****
The Chair of the Whois RT has kindly agreed to participate in this meeting
and provide an update.****
Update from Whois RT Chair (Emily Taylor)****
Discussion****
** **
** **
*Draft Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting – 19 January 2012*****
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-19jan12-en.htm****
*Wiki Agenda*
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+19+January+2012
*GNSO Council motions*
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+19+January+2012
****
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating
Procedures approved 22 September 2011 for the GNSO Council and updated.
http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-16dec11-en.pdf****
For convenience:****
* An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided
in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
* An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.****
Meeting Time 11:00
UTC<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=GNSO+Council+Meeting&iso=20111117T20&ah=2>
****
Coordinated Universal Time: 11:00 UTC****
03:00 Los Angeles; 06:00 Washington DC; 11:00 London; 12:00 Paris; 20:00
Tokyo;****
20 January 2012
00:00 Wellington****
Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors
should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.*
***
*GNSO Council meeting audiocast *****
*http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u*****
*Item 1: Administrative matters (10 minutes)*****
**1.1 **Roll Call*
*
1.2 Statement of interest updates
1.3 Review/amend agenda ****
1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the
GNSO Operating Procedures:****
**· **15 December GNSO Council minutes –approved on 3 January
2012.
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-15dec11-en.htm****
. **
*Item 2: GNSO Pending Projects List (5 minutes)*****
Standard agenda item looking at changes made to the GNSO's Pending Projects
list since the previous meeting.
Refer to Pending Projects list
http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf****
2.1 Changes to Pending Projects List since last Council meeting (Stéphane
Van Gelder)****
• GNSO activities: 9 (9 - No change).
• Other activities: 10 (10 – No Change)
• Joint SO/AC WGs: 7 (7 - no change).
• Outstanding recommendations: 2 (2 - no change).****
*Item 3: Update Whois Review Team (RT) (10 minutes)*****
Recent events like the recent National Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) letter
http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/strickling-to-crocker-03jan12-en.pdf
****
show that Whois remains very much in the spotlight. It therefore appears
useful for the Council to have an update from the Whois RT so that the
Council has a clearer idea of what potential policy development it might be
called to work on in the near future.****
** **
The Chair of the Whois RT has kindly agreed to participate in this meeting
and provide an update.****
** **
Update from Whois RT Chair (Emily Taylor)****
Discussion****
** **
*Item 4: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part B (IRTP B) Rec 9 part 2 (10
minutes)*****
As adopted by the Council on 22 June 2011
http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions#201106-1 the Council requested Staff to
provide a proposal for replacing denial reason #7 by adding a new provision
in a different section of the IRTP on when and how domains may be locked or
unlocked, taking into account the IRTP Part B WG deliberations in relation
to this issue (see IRTP Part B Final Report - (Recommendation #9 - part 2).*
***
Staff submitted its recommendation on January 3, 2012
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg12545.html
ICANN Staff Proposal on IRTP Part B Recommendation
#8<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/irtp-b-8-staff-proposal-22nov11-en.pdf>
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/irtp-b-8-staff-proposal-22nov11-en.pdf
ICANN Staff Proposal on IRTP Part B Recommendation #9 part
2<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/irtp-b-9-part-2-staff-proposal-22nov11-en.pdf>[
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/irtp-b-9-part-2-staff-proposal-22nov11-en.pdf**
**
Council must now consider whether to approve it.****
Refer to motion :****
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+19+January+2012
****
** **
4.1 Reading of the motion (Mason Cole).****
4.2 Discussion****
4.3 Vote****
*Item 5: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part B (IRTP B) Rec 8 (10 minutes)*
****
As adopted by the Council on 22 June 2011
http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions#201106-1 the Council requested Staff to
provide a proposal designed to ensure a technically feasible approach can
be developed to meet the following recommendation "prior to the
consideration of approval of the recommendation regarding the standardizing
and clarifying WHOIS status messages regarding Registrar Lock status".****
Staff submitted its recommendation on January 3, 2012
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg12545.html
Council must now consider whether to approve it.****
Refer to motion
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+19+January+2012
****
5.1 Reading of the motion (Mason Cole).****
5.2 Discussion****
5.3 Vote****
*Item 6: Cross Community Working Group Drafting Team (CCWG DT) (10 minutes)
*****
On January 4, 2012, the CCWG Drafting Team sent the Council Chair its final
recommendations with regard to the GNSO's approach on Community Working
Groups.
Refer to:
Draft Principles for Cross‐Community Working Groups (CWGs)
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-principles-for-cwgs-23dec11-en.pdf****
Council must now consider whether to approve these recommendations.****
Refer to motion
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg12545.html****
6.1 Reading of the motion (Jonathan Robinson).****
6.2 Discussion****
6.3 Vote
*Item 7: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part B (IRTP B) Rec 7 (10 minutes)*
****
A resolution was passed by the Council at its Dec 15, 2011 meeting to
address recommendation 7 of the IRTP part B WG on the requirement to lock a
domain subject to UDRP proceedings.****
Refer to Dec 15 resolution : http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#201112****
The new GNSO PDP rules state that a group of volunteers should be convened
to draft a WG charter, which should then be approved by the Council.****
This is an information item on the state of the DT.****
7.1 Update by Staff (Marika Konings).****
7.2 Discussion****
7.3 Next steps****
*Item 8: Outreach Task Force Charter (20 minutes)*****
As part of the GNSO improvements, the Operations Steering Committee (OSC)'s
Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operations Work Team worked on a set of
recommendations on a global outreach program****
The Council has considered motions on this recently been no agreement has
been found. As the original request came from the ICANN Board, the Council
leadership feels an answer should be provided. That answer may be not to
approve, to approve, or to determine that the Council as a body does not
want to voice an opinion, although specific GNSO SGs and Cs are obviously
still free to.****
The Council ledareship suggests that is that this topic be discussed at the
GNSO week-end sessions in the forthcoming ICANN International Meeting in
March 2012. To set the scene for these discussions, this agenda item is to
provide some historical context into this topic.****
8.1 Update and presentation from staff (Liz Gasster)****
8.2 Discussion****
** **
*Item 9: Whois Accessibility (20 minutes)*
** **
The GNSO Council resolved at its meeting on 6 October to request the Whois
Survey Drafting Team to consider including the issue of WHOIS Access as
recommended by the RAP WG as part of the survey it has been tasked to
develop. The Whois Survey Drafting Team provided its response to the GNSO
Council on 10 January (see
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg12559.html) noting
that 'the WSWG determined inclusion of the RAPWG’s recommendation aligned
more with policy and thus the WSWG considered it to be out of scope'. In
addition, the WSWG provided the GNSO Council in its response with
additional information 'so that it may make a better informed decision
about the access recommendation'.****
**9.1 **Response of WGWS (Wendy Seltzer, Council Liaison to WSWG****
**9.2 ** Discussion****
9.3 Next steps****
** **
*Item 10: Any Other Business (5 minutes)*
** **
Glen de Saint Géry****
GNSO Secretariat****
gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org****
http://gnso.icann.org****
** **
*De :* owner-gnso-chairs at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-chairs at icann.org] *De
la part de* Stéphane Van Gelder
*Envoyé :* lundi 16 janvier 2012 16:56
*À :* emily at emilytaylor.eu
*Cc :* Gnso Chairs
*Objet :* [gnso-chairs] Whois RT update****
** **
Thanks Emily,****
** **
That's great. We have set aside a slot for this in our agenda for the next
Council meeting, this Thursday.****
** **
Glen, the Council secretariat, will liaise with you to find the time which
best suits you to do this.****
** **
Thanks agains.****
** **
Stéphane****
****
****
****
*From:* Emily Taylor [mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu <emily at emilytaylor.eu>]
*Sent:* Monday, January 09, 2012 5:59 AM
*To:* Stéphane Van Gelder
*Cc:* Emily Taylor; Neuman, Jeff; Wolf Knoben
*Subject:* Re: Whois RT update****
****
My goodness! What a coincidence. I was on the point of writing to you to
suggest a briefing with Council.
I would be very happy to join a call and perhaps if you let me know the
timings I can throw the invitation open to other members of the Whois
Review Team, in case they are also able to make the call.
Kind regards and best wishes for the New Year
Emily
On Monday, 9 January 2012, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder at indom.com>
wrote:
> Hi Emily,
>
> I hope you are well and I wish you a very Happy New Year.
>
> We have a GNSO Council meeting next week and in planning for that
meeting, I was wondering in the light of the recent NTIA letter that the
Whois is once again very firmly in the spotlight. Would it be useful to
have an update from you or someone from the Whois RT so that the Council
has a clearer idea of what potential policy development might be in the
wings?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
>
--
****
*
*
76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu
*www.etlaw.co.uk*
Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.****
****
** **
--
*
*
76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu
*www.etlaw.co.uk*
Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120117/b2f5bf62/attachment.html
More information about the Rt4-whois
mailing list