From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Wed Feb 29 20:09:22 2012 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:09:22 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Call with ICANN Board Message-ID: <20120229130922.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.45adf4dbb2.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120229/25779d20/attachment.html From kathy at kathykleiman.com Wed Feb 29 20:17:17 2012 From: kathy at kathykleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Call with ICANN Board In-Reply-To: <20120229130922.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.45adf4dbb2.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> References: <20120229130922.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.45adf4dbb2.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <4F4E87CD.2010100@kathykleiman.com> Tx Lynn, for starting the discussion on this. I also thought everyone did a great job, and that all of us (as usual) chipped in to help. Tx All! Kathy p.s. I am sorry you won't be in CR Lynn -- you will truly be missed. Can you possibly join us by phone for part of the Wednesday RT meeting? : > Thank you Emily for leading the call with the ICANN Board - well done! > > Thanks also to Kathy, James and Susan for clarifications regarding > proxy/privacy services. > > Regret that I cannot attend the Costa Rica meeting but feel > comfortable that our team will be > represented well. > > Lynn Goodendorf > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120229/22f285c0/attachment.html From kathy at kathykleiman.com Wed Feb 29 20:33:43 2012 From: kathy at kathykleiman.com (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] REMINDER - Call with ICANN Board today @ 19:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F34184A961FADA5@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> References: <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F34184A961FADA5@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Message-ID: <4F4E8BA7.40402@kathykleiman.com> Hi All, There are some very interesting discussion items in the chat room text below -- and it shares a sense of what's on the minds of the Board. I expect we'll see a continuation of the types of issues raised below in our meeting with the Board in Costa Rica. So if you missed the call, thanks for taking a quick read through... Best, Kathy: > > Dear all, > > Please find the chat transcript from the call below, and also the > final slide deck attached as presented (featuring a very minor > correction in relation to the version sent earlier). > > Very best regards > > Olof > > ------------------ > > CHAT TRANSCRIPT > > Olof Nordling: (2/29/2012 18:39) Welcome to the WHOIS RT - ICANN Board > Webinar! > > Kathy Kleiman: (19:56) Hi All! > > Ram Mohan: (19:58) hi > > Emily Taylor: (19:59) Hi > > Diane: (19:59) hello > > Omar Kaminski: (19:59) hi > > judith: (20:01) Hello > > cherine chalaby: (20:01) hi > > Akram Atallah: (20:01) hello everyone! > > Mike Silber: (20:01) Thanks Olaf - hi all > > Steve Crocker: (20:08) Minor comment: Whois is tied to domain names, > not web sites. > > Thomas Narten: (20:10) does the 20% figure include proxy > registrations? I.e., are those considered "inaccurate"? > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:12) There is a separate study in play, right now, > as Emily notes. > > Ram Mohan: (20:12) not sure i understand the policy gap bullet - are > you stating that the proxy service is not congruent with offering > privacy? Or whether there is doubt about accuracy? > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:13) Thomas, if you could reach the proxy service > (or privacy service) with accurate information in the Whois, that was > "reachable" > > Susan: (20:13) and there is no clear definition of Privacy versus > Proxy registrations > > Susan: (20:13) very confused at the moment > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:15) Privacy - registrant's name + privacy service > contact information; proxy service - all information, including > registrant is listed as the proxy service provider. > > Ram Mohan: (20:15) in the .INFO TLD, over 60% of abusive names are > proxied; a few registrars cooperate after the registry identifies a > potential problem, but in most cases the registry can't really draw > many patterns from proxy registrations > > Ram Mohan: (20:15) so i don't understand what is meant by need to > raise awareness and improve user-friendliness... > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:17) legitimate uses of proxy services shared with > us by both commercial and noncommercial user groups. > > Ram Mohan: (20:18) thanks Emily! > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:26) Ram, one of the larger issues we (Review > Team) would like to encourage is a "culture of compliance." > > Ram Mohan: (20:27) Kathy - got it. But there is "compliance" and > there is Compliance... > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:27) Good point :-)! > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:34) And also Data Protection Commissioners who > have tried to participate over the years, but find it hard to follow > over long periods of time. Outreach on new policy issues. > > Steve Crocker: (20:34) Reduce by 50% from what level? > > Steve Crocker: (20:36) 23% wholly inaccurate. 21% inaccurate to the > point of inability to reach the registrant. > > Steve Crocker: (20:36) Sorry: 23% wholly accurate... > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:37) "Contactibility" > > Steve Crocker: (20:37) Where does the 50% goal come from? Why not a > larger or smaller number? How feasible is this goal? > > Ram Mohan: (20:38) in practice, quite a few "non-contactable" > registrants are from large companies, where employees have left but > the records have not been updated. I worry about measures such as > removing the domain altogether if the registrant is unreachable. > Perhaps a WHOIS Data Redemption Period has to be created, where the > name goes dark but can be restored upon more accurate data? > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:39) who is speaking, please? > > Steve Crocker: (20:39) Is there a target level that would be > considered sufficient? E.g. 80% contactible? 90%? 95%? 99%? 99.9%? > > Susan: (20:40) I agree with you Ram but in the obvious cases which I > run into frequently where the only information is and "a" in each field > > Susan: (20:40) I think action should be taken swiftly > > judith: (20:40) Billing & collection records are from my experience > always accurate. Money talks. > > Susan: (20:41) I agree with you Judith but that data is not always > included in the WHOIS > > Steve Crocker: (20:41) Judith, you're right! > > Ram Mohan: (20:41) Susan - ugh! Better penalties, with a decent > remedy could work then. That's what I mean by the WHOIS Data > Redemption Period - the name goes down, if the name is not contactable > > Susan: (20:41) If the billing data that is verified was included in > the WHOIS record then we would have more accuracy > > judith: (20:42) Yes Susan. WHOis data is almost always filled up by > an individual in an IT Dept where there is frequent employee churn. > > Susan: (20:42) not in a well managed domain name portfolio! > > Ram Mohan: (20:42) Susan - that won't work in the case of proxy data... > > judith: (20:42) I am referring to the Registrant. > > Susan: (20:43) my view point (not necessarily ) as a team member but > as Facebook employee content should never be served on a proxy > registration > > Susan: (20:44) that is what Privacy registrations are for > > Ram Mohan: (20:44) is a rubbish record = a rubbish domain? > > Bill Graham: (20:44) Going forward, could there not be a requirement > that whois data be accurate for a new registrant (some TLDs do that > now). Won't help with cleanup, but if done before the new gTLDs come > along, it would be a step forward > > Ram Mohan: (20:44) if we got rid of a rubbish record, what happens > to the domain linked to the record? > > Susan: (20:45) Bill I would agree, the new gTlds should be required > to verify for accuracy > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:46) Quick note that there may be a difference > between knowing who the Registrant is, and reaching the Registrant to > let me know about a legal concern (e.g., a cease and desist letter) > > Thomas Narten: (20:46) my point is that the only domain names that > people care about looking up in whois is ones where someone believes > some sort of abuse is going on. Is that a fair statement? > > Susan: (20:46) Not completely > > Emily Taylor: (20:47) Thomas - not entirely. It's an important > aspect, but not the only one. > > Ram Mohan: (20:47) Bill - accuracy is itself not fully defined > > Mike Silber: (20:47) just to try get a benchmark - given the comment > about GoDaddy going beyond simple compliance - what are their figures > like? > > Susan: (20:47) in acquisitions or domain name management I use the > WHOIS records of our domain names on a daily basis > > Bladel: (20:48) @MIke: Do you mean internal GoDaddy stats? > > Bladel: (20:49) The NORC accuracy study was not, to my knowledge, > broken down by registrar (altho this would be very interesting!). > > Mike Silber: (20:51) if they are willing to share - even if rough or > under confidentiality > > judith: (20:51) Problem being- domain names have become so > inexpensive- aking to a disposable consumer item. Does Wal-Mart track > who bought a $35 T-shirt? > > Mike Silber: (20:52) would like to know where a registrar "who > cares" sits, so we know better what the worst case of those who do not > care are sitting with > > Bladel: (20:53) @Judith: Considering this has made Internet / DNS > participation open to millions of new global users, we do not see > inexpensive fees as a "problem." > > Susan: (20:53) Judith I have always felt that domain name > registrations fees do not cover the full expense of registering and > administering a domain name > > Susan: (20:54) If the registrars charged more and used the funds to > verify data it would shrink the problems we have > > Susan: (20:54) companies are picking up the expenses due to the lack > of accuracy > > Diane: (20:54) Do I have a set of the slides available to send to > the board members who arent attending? > > judith: (20:54) I agree with you, Susan. > > Ram Mohan: (20:54) @Bladel: GoDaddy offers a *lot* for a low cost > registration, and seem to be a success, so not sure more $$ will > result in better accuracy > > judith: (20:55) GoDaddy sells services. > > Olof Nordling: (20:56) Yes, sent with the reminder this morning (my > morning) but I'll send you one slightly improved in a jiffy > > Ram Mohan: (20:56) @Judith - i am not sure data shows that low > prices leads to lower accuracy, or vice versa > > Thomas Narten: (20:56) people aren't paying for domain names with > "cash". > > judith: (20:57) From personal experience- I never bother to update > my corporate whois data! > > Diane: (20:57) Thanks Olof - will distribute to the board after the call > > Kathy Kleiman: (20:58) On this point, we talked with ICANN Staff, > and they mentioned that an expansion of Internic might be possible. > > Lynn Goodendorf: (20:58) unfortunately, there are domain names paid > for with stolen credit card data; this was presented by Law Enforcement > > Steve Crocker: (21:03) Thanks Emily and everyone. I need to break > off to head to the airport. > > Seth Reiss 2: (21:04) Thanks Emily and Board > > Ram Mohan: (21:04) Thanks Emily & Whois team for a good overview, > and look forward to a good session in Costa Rica > > Kathy Kleiman: (21:04) Tx Steve! > > Kathy Kleiman: (21:05) Any questions? > > Michael Yakushev: (21:05) thanks to all > > judith: (21:05) Thank you! > > Olof Nordling: (21:05) Thanks all! > > Kathy Kleiman: (21:05) Tx All! > > *From:*Olof Nordling > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 29, 2012 6:37 PM > *To:* Olof Nordling; Diane Schroeder; Alina Syunkova; Denise Michel; > 'Emily Taylor'; 'Kathy Kleiman'; 'Nettlefold, Peter'; 'Mikhail > Yakushev'; 'Smith, Bill'; Alice Jansen; 'Lynn Goodendorf'; 'Lynn2 > Goodendorf'; 'LEMON, Sharon'; 'Sharon Lemon'; 'Omar Kaminski'; 'Sarmad > Hussain'; 'Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet'; 'Susan Kawaguchi'; 'James > Bladel'; 'Lutz Donnerhacke'; 'Seth M Reiss' > *Subject:* RE: REMINDER -- Call with ICANN Board today @ 19:00 UTC > > Dear Review Team Members, > > With around 90 minutes left until the call begins, I would just like > to remind you again to please *identify yourselves at the call before > you speak*. This will facilitate for all -- not the least for the > scribes (who may be used to the voices of the Board members, but less > so when it comes to Review Team members...) > > Thanks! > > Olof > > *From:*Olof Nordling > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:37 AM > *To:* Diane Schroeder; Alina Syunkova; Olof Nordling; Denise Michel; > 'Emily Taylor'; 'Kathy Kleiman'; 'Nettlefold, Peter'; 'Mikhail > Yakushev'; 'Smith, Bill'; 'Lynn Goodendorf'; 'Lynn2 Goodendorf'; > 'LEMON, Sharon'; 'Sharon Lemon'; 'Omar Kaminski'; 'Sarmad Hussain'; > 'Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet'; 'Susan Kawaguchi'; 'James Bladel'; > 'Lutz Donnerhacke'; 'Seth M Reiss' > *Subject:* REMINDER -- Call with ICANN Board today @ 19:00 UTC > > Dear Review Team Members, > > Your conference call with the ICANN Board of Directors is scheduled for: > > ***Wednesday, 29 February 2012*** > > *19:00 UTC* > > *Please be kindly reminded to identify yourself before you speak.* > > /Please check your local time at/: > > *http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=WHOIS+RT-ICANN+BOARD+OF+DIRECTORS&iso=20120229T19 > * > > PASSWORD: *27318 **followed by **# * > > *_Adobe room_**: **http://icann.adobeconnect.com/whois-review/* > > *_Dial-in numbers:_* > > Please find below a table which encapsulates dial-in numbers for your > countries of residence. > > Should you be traveling, please refer to the full list which is > available at: *http://www.adigo.com/icann/* > > *Australia* > > > > 1 800 009 820 > > 1 800 036 775 > > Sydney T +61 290372962 > > Melbourne T +61 399996500 > > Brisbane T +61 731777546 > > *Austria* > > > > L - 0 800 295 858 > > M - 0 800 295 138 > > T - +43 720 882 638 > > *Belgium* > > > > L - 0800 79210 > > M -- 0800 79218 > > T - +32 78 480 286 > > *Brazil* > > > > L - 0800 891 1597 > > M - 0800 891 1598 > > T - +55 613 717 2040 > > *Canada* > > > > 1 800 550 6865 > > T - +1 213 233 3193 > > *France* > > > > 0800 90 25 56 > > T - +33 170618347 > > *Germany* > > > > L - 0800 1016 120 > > G - M 0800 1016 124 > > *Russia* > > > > 8 10 8002 535 3011 > T - +7 499 650 7835 > > *United Kingdom* > > > > 0800 032 6646 > > T - +44 207 099 0867 > > *United States* > > > > 1 800 550 6865 > > T - +1 213 233 3193 > > /T -- local toll number ; M -- mobile preferred number ; L -- landline > preferred number/ > > Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require a dial-out for > this call. > > Please also find attached the slides that will be presented at the call. > > Very best regards > > Olof > -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120229/cf6319ef/attachment.html From denise.michel at icann.org Thu Mar 1 05:03:59 2012 From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:03:59 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica Message-ID: Dear Team Members, The Costa Rica schedule has been posted: http://costarica43.icann.org/full-schedule In addition to the meetings/events you requested, you also may be interested in: - "Compliance Sessions" (informational update) - Monday - "RAA Progress Report and WHOIS Data Validation" workshop (update on RAA negotiations; discussion of data validation mechanisms) - Tuesday - "Consumer Trust" workshop (involving new gTLDs and 4th AoC review) - Wednesday - "Replacement of WHOIS" workshop (IDN Whois focus) - Thursday Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120229/e944400f/attachment.html From Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au Thu Mar 1 06:04:02 2012 From: Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au (Nettlefold, Peter) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:04:02 +1100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A3351C5F4C2@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Thanks Denise - particularly for highlighting those other interesting sessions. I for one am going to want to be in two places at once for much of my time in Costa Rica! Cheers, Peter From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Denise Michel Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012 4:04 PM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica Dear Team Members, The Costa Rica schedule has been posted: http://costarica43.icann.org/full-schedule In addition to the meetings/events you requested, you also may be interested in: * "Compliance Sessions" (informational update) - Monday * "RAA Progress Report and WHOIS Data Validation" workshop (update on RAA negotiations; discussion of data validation mechanisms) - Tuesday * "Consumer Trust" workshop (involving new gTLDs and 4th AoC review) - Wednesday * "Replacement of WHOIS" workshop (IDN Whois focus) - Thursday Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120301/c0ebfa5c/attachment.html From Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au Thu Mar 1 06:06:10 2012 From: Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au (Nettlefold, Peter) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:06:10 +1100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] REMINDER - Call with ICANN Board today @ 19:00 UTC [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] In-Reply-To: <4F4E8BA7.40402@kathykleiman.com> References: <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F34184A961FADA5@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> <4F4E8BA7.40402@kathykleiman.com> Message-ID: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A3351C5F4CF@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Thanks Kathy and all - I'm glad to hear that the call went well, and I look forward to reading the chat notes to get a sense of the discussion. Cheers, Peter From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012 7:34 AM To: Olof Nordling; rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] REMINDER - Call with ICANN Board today @ 19:00 UTC Hi All, There are some very interesting discussion items in the chat room text below -- and it shares a sense of what's on the minds of the Board. I expect we'll see a continuation of the types of issues raised below in our meeting with the Board in Costa Rica. So if you missed the call, thanks for taking a quick read through... Best, Kathy: Dear all, Please find the chat transcript from the call below, and also the final slide deck attached as presented (featuring a very minor correction in relation to the version sent earlier). Very best regards Olof ------------------ CHAT TRANSCRIPT Olof Nordling: (2/29/2012 18:39) Welcome to the WHOIS RT - ICANN Board Webinar! Kathy Kleiman: (19:56) Hi All! Ram Mohan: (19:58) hi Emily Taylor: (19:59) Hi Diane: (19:59) hello Omar Kaminski: (19:59) hi judith: (20:01) Hello cherine chalaby: (20:01) hi Akram Atallah: (20:01) hello everyone! Mike Silber: (20:01) Thanks Olaf - hi all Steve Crocker: (20:08) Minor comment: Whois is tied to domain names, not web sites. Thomas Narten: (20:10) does the 20% figure include proxy registrations? I.e., are those considered "inaccurate"? Kathy Kleiman: (20:12) There is a separate study in play, right now, as Emily notes. Ram Mohan: (20:12) not sure i understand the policy gap bullet - are you stating that the proxy service is not congruent with offering privacy? Or whether there is doubt about accuracy? Kathy Kleiman: (20:13) Thomas, if you could reach the proxy service (or privacy service) with accurate information in the Whois, that was "reachable" Susan: (20:13) and there is no clear definition of Privacy versus Proxy registrations Susan: (20:13) very confused at the moment Kathy Kleiman: (20:15) Privacy - registrant's name + privacy service contact information; proxy service - all information, including registrant is listed as the proxy service provider. Ram Mohan: (20:15) in the .INFO TLD, over 60% of abusive names are proxied; a few registrars cooperate after the registry identifies a potential problem, but in most cases the registry can't really draw many patterns from proxy registrations Ram Mohan: (20:15) so i don't understand what is meant by need to raise awareness and improve user-friendliness... Kathy Kleiman: (20:17) legitimate uses of proxy services shared with us by both commercial and noncommercial user groups. Ram Mohan: (20:18) thanks Emily! Kathy Kleiman: (20:26) Ram, one of the larger issues we (Review Team) would like to encourage is a "culture of compliance." Ram Mohan: (20:27) Kathy - got it. But there is "compliance" and there is Compliance... Kathy Kleiman: (20:27) Good point :-)! Kathy Kleiman: (20:34) And also Data Protection Commissioners who have tried to participate over the years, but find it hard to follow over long periods of time. Outreach on new policy issues. Steve Crocker: (20:34) Reduce by 50% from what level? Steve Crocker: (20:36) 23% wholly inaccurate. 21% inaccurate to the point of inability to reach the registrant. Steve Crocker: (20:36) Sorry: 23% wholly accurate... Kathy Kleiman: (20:37) "Contactibility" Steve Crocker: (20:37) Where does the 50% goal come from? Why not a larger or smaller number? How feasible is this goal? Ram Mohan: (20:38) in practice, quite a few "non-contactable" registrants are from large companies, where employees have left but the records have not been updated. I worry about measures such as removing the domain altogether if the registrant is unreachable. Perhaps a WHOIS Data Redemption Period has to be created, where the name goes dark but can be restored upon more accurate data? Kathy Kleiman: (20:39) who is speaking, please? Steve Crocker: (20:39) Is there a target level that would be considered sufficient? E.g. 80% contactible? 90%? 95%? 99%? 99.9%? Susan: (20:40) I agree with you Ram but in the obvious cases which I run into frequently where the only information is and "a" in each field Susan: (20:40) I think action should be taken swiftly judith: (20:40) Billing & collection records are from my experience always accurate. Money talks. Susan: (20:41) I agree with you Judith but that data is not always included in the WHOIS Steve Crocker: (20:41) Judith, you're right! Ram Mohan: (20:41) Susan - ugh! Better penalties, with a decent remedy could work then. That's what I mean by the WHOIS Data Redemption Period - the name goes down, if the name is not contactable Susan: (20:41) If the billing data that is verified was included in the WHOIS record then we would have more accuracy judith: (20:42) Yes Susan. WHOis data is almost always filled up by an individual in an IT Dept where there is frequent employee churn. Susan: (20:42) not in a well managed domain name portfolio! Ram Mohan: (20:42) Susan - that won't work in the case of proxy data... judith: (20:42) I am referring to the Registrant. Susan: (20:43) my view point (not necessarily ) as a team member but as Facebook employee content should never be served on a proxy registration Susan: (20:44) that is what Privacy registrations are for Ram Mohan: (20:44) is a rubbish record = a rubbish domain? Bill Graham: (20:44) Going forward, could there not be a requirement that whois data be accurate for a new registrant (some TLDs do that now). Won't help with cleanup, but if done before the new gTLDs come along, it would be a step forward Ram Mohan: (20:44) if we got rid of a rubbish record, what happens to the domain linked to the record? Susan: (20:45) Bill I would agree, the new gTlds should be required to verify for accuracy Kathy Kleiman: (20:46) Quick note that there may be a difference between knowing who the Registrant is, and reaching the Registrant to let me know about a legal concern (e.g., a cease and desist letter) Thomas Narten: (20:46) my point is that the only domain names that people care about looking up in whois is ones where someone believes some sort of abuse is going on. Is that a fair statement? Susan: (20:46) Not completely Emily Taylor: (20:47) Thomas - not entirely. It's an important aspect, but not the only one. Ram Mohan: (20:47) Bill - accuracy is itself not fully defined Mike Silber: (20:47) just to try get a benchmark - given the comment about GoDaddy going beyond simple compliance - what are their figures like? Susan: (20:47) in acquisitions or domain name management I use the WHOIS records of our domain names on a daily basis Bladel: (20:48) @MIke: Do you mean internal GoDaddy stats? Bladel: (20:49) The NORC accuracy study was not, to my knowledge, broken down by registrar (altho this would be very interesting!). Mike Silber: (20:51) if they are willing to share - even if rough or under confidentiality judith: (20:51) Problem being- domain names have become so inexpensive- aking to a disposable consumer item. Does Wal-Mart track who bought a $35 T-shirt? Mike Silber: (20:52) would like to know where a registrar "who cares" sits, so we know better what the worst case of those who do not care are sitting with Bladel: (20:53) @Judith: Considering this has made Internet / DNS participation open to millions of new global users, we do not see inexpensive fees as a "problem." Susan: (20:53) Judith I have always felt that domain name registrations fees do not cover the full expense of registering and administering a domain name Susan: (20:54) If the registrars charged more and used the funds to verify data it would shrink the problems we have Susan: (20:54) companies are picking up the expenses due to the lack of accuracy Diane: (20:54) Do I have a set of the slides available to send to the board members who arent attending? judith: (20:54) I agree with you, Susan. Ram Mohan: (20:54) @Bladel: GoDaddy offers a *lot* for a low cost registration, and seem to be a success, so not sure more $$ will result in better accuracy judith: (20:55) GoDaddy sells services. Olof Nordling: (20:56) Yes, sent with the reminder this morning (my morning) but I'll send you one slightly improved in a jiffy Ram Mohan: (20:56) @Judith - i am not sure data shows that low prices leads to lower accuracy, or vice versa Thomas Narten: (20:56) people aren't paying for domain names with "cash". judith: (20:57) From personal experience- I never bother to update my corporate whois data! Diane: (20:57) Thanks Olof - will distribute to the board after the call Kathy Kleiman: (20:58) On this point, we talked with ICANN Staff, and they mentioned that an expansion of Internic might be possible. Lynn Goodendorf: (20:58) unfortunately, there are domain names paid for with stolen credit card data; this was presented by Law Enforcement Steve Crocker: (21:03) Thanks Emily and everyone. I need to break off to head to the airport. Seth Reiss 2: (21:04) Thanks Emily and Board Ram Mohan: (21:04) Thanks Emily & Whois team for a good overview, and look forward to a good session in Costa Rica Kathy Kleiman: (21:04) Tx Steve! Kathy Kleiman: (21:05) Any questions? Michael Yakushev: (21:05) thanks to all judith: (21:05) Thank you! Olof Nordling: (21:05) Thanks all! Kathy Kleiman: (21:05) Tx All! From: Olof Nordling Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 6:37 PM To: Olof Nordling; Diane Schroeder; Alina Syunkova; Denise Michel; 'Emily Taylor'; 'Kathy Kleiman'; 'Nettlefold, Peter'; 'Mikhail Yakushev'; 'Smith, Bill'; Alice Jansen; 'Lynn Goodendorf'; 'Lynn2 Goodendorf'; 'LEMON, Sharon'; 'Sharon Lemon'; 'Omar Kaminski'; 'Sarmad Hussain'; 'Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet'; 'Susan Kawaguchi'; 'James Bladel'; 'Lutz Donnerhacke'; 'Seth M Reiss' Subject: RE: REMINDER - Call with ICANN Board today @ 19:00 UTC Dear Review Team Members, With around 90 minutes left until the call begins, I would just like to remind you again to please identify yourselves at the call before you speak. This will facilitate for all - not the least for the scribes (who may be used to the voices of the Board members, but less so when it comes to Review Team members...) Thanks! Olof From: Olof Nordling Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:37 AM To: Diane Schroeder; Alina Syunkova; Olof Nordling; Denise Michel; 'Emily Taylor'; 'Kathy Kleiman'; 'Nettlefold, Peter'; 'Mikhail Yakushev'; 'Smith, Bill'; 'Lynn Goodendorf'; 'Lynn2 Goodendorf'; 'LEMON, Sharon'; 'Sharon Lemon'; 'Omar Kaminski'; 'Sarmad Hussain'; 'Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet'; 'Susan Kawaguchi'; 'James Bladel'; 'Lutz Donnerhacke'; 'Seth M Reiss' Subject: REMINDER - Call with ICANN Board today @ 19:00 UTC Dear Review Team Members, Your conference call with the ICANN Board of Directors is scheduled for: **Wednesday, 29 February 2012** 19:00 UTC Please be kindly reminded to identify yourself before you speak. Please check your local time at: http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=WHOIS+RT-ICANN+BOARD+OF+DIRECTORS&iso=20120229T19 PASSWORD: 27318 followed by # Adobe room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/whois-review/ Dial-in numbers: Please find below a table which encapsulates dial-in numbers for your countries of residence. Should you be traveling, please refer to the full list which is available at: http://www.adigo.com/icann/ Australia 1 800 009 820 1 800 036 775 Sydney T +61 290372962 Melbourne T +61 399996500 Brisbane T +61 731777546 Austria L - 0 800 295 858 M - 0 800 295 138 T - +43 720 882 638 Belgium L - 0800 79210 M - 0800 79218 T - +32 78 480 286 Brazil L - 0800 891 1597 M - 0800 891 1598 T - +55 613 717 2040 Canada 1 800 550 6865 T - +1 213 233 3193 France 0800 90 25 56 T - +33 170618347 Germany L - 0800 1016 120 G - M 0800 1016 124 Russia 8 10 8002 535 3011 T - +7 499 650 7835 United Kingdom 0800 032 6646 T - +44 207 099 0867 United States 1 800 550 6865 T - +1 213 233 3193 T - local toll number ; M - mobile preferred number ; L - landline preferred number Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require a dial-out for this call. Please also find attached the slides that will be presented at the call. Very best regards Olof -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120301/d9f0e403/attachment.html From Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au Fri Mar 2 01:16:44 2012 From: Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au (Nettlefold, Peter) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:16:44 +1100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A3351C5F93B@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Hi Denise and review team colleagues, I'm writing to check a few things in relation to the meeting schedule and preparations for Costa Rica. I expect that the first is just a typo, but I wanted to double check - Denise, you mention below the 'RAA progress report and WHOIS data validation' workshop is on Tuesday, but on the ICANN schedule it's down for 1-3pm on the Monday - I assume the ICANN schedule is correct, and it's on for the Monday? I also see that the ICANN schedule has us down for our interaction with the community from 4.30-6 on the Monday. The last schedule I remember seeing had this down for 2-3.30, and this still is the time listed on the link in the attached. I have no problem with the later time, and am really just wanting to confirm it for my calendar - does anyone know which is correct? I also note that the earlier schedule had us down for an internal/team debrief from 4-5.30, which would have been after the community interaction in the earlier schedule. Assuming we're now meeting from 4.30-6, are we still planning to do a debrief afterwards, at a later time? I apologise if I've missed some discussions on this and should already know the answer, but I'm just trying to get my calendar sorted, so any help would be appreciated. On a different track, I seem to have lost track of submissions to our discussion paper - I recall we had received a couple of informal submissions/comments, but I can't seem to find them anywhere beyond archived emails, and I hadn't seen anything further for a while. Have we received any/many submissions yet, and if so are they accessible in a centralised place, so that I can catch up on my reading before our discussions in Costa Rica? Lastly, and just for information, I'll have a number of overlaps in Costa Rica with GAC meetings (as is usually the case). Unfortunately, this will mean that I will have to miss much of Sunday's WHOIS meeting, although I will try to resolve part of the overlap at the GAC end so that I can attend the meeting with the GNSO Council from 5.30-6.30. I should then be ok for dinner Sunday if it goes ahead, all of Monday's sessions (at either time), Tuesday's meeting with the GAC, and most of the Wednesday meeting (I'm hoping to be at the WHOIS meeting most of the day, but will have to leave by 2 at the latest). I apologise for the long email (!), and look forward to seeing you all soon. Cheers, Peter From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Denise Michel Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012 4:04 PM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica Dear Team Members, The Costa Rica schedule has been posted: http://costarica43.icann.org/full-schedule In addition to the meetings/events you requested, you also may be interested in: * "Compliance Sessions" (informational update) - Monday * "RAA Progress Report and WHOIS Data Validation" workshop (update on RAA negotiations; discussion of data validation mechanisms) - Tuesday * "Consumer Trust" workshop (involving new gTLDs and 4th AoC review) - Wednesday * "Replacement of WHOIS" workshop (IDN Whois focus) - Thursday Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120302/0f15c8a7/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Alice Jansen" Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica schedule Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:45:03 +1100 Size: 22479 Url: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120302/0f15c8a7/attachment.mht From denise.michel at icann.org Fri Mar 2 20:18:04 2012 From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:18:04 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] In-Reply-To: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A3351C5F93B@EMB01.dept.gov.au> References: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A3351C5F93B@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Message-ID: Hello, Peter. The RAA Progress Report & Whois Validation Workshop is indeed on Monday. Sorry about my typo. The authoritative schedule is the one posted: http://costarica43.icann.org/full-schedule The Team's public forum had to be slotted a bit later in the afternoon due to scheduling issues with the ballroom. This will necessitate changing the time for the Team's internal debrief meeting. Alice & Olof will follow-up with some alternatives for this. The publicly submitted comments on the draft report are posted here: http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-rt-draft-final-report/ Alice is collecting informal input as directed. Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Nettlefold, Peter < Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au> wrote: > Hi Denise and review team colleagues,**** > > ** ** > > I?m writing to check a few things in relation to the meeting schedule and > preparations for Costa Rica.**** > > ** ** > > I expect that the first is just a typo, but I wanted to double check ? > Denise, you mention below the ?RAA progress report and WHOIS data > validation? workshop is on Tuesday, but on the ICANN schedule it?s down for > 1-3pm on the Monday ? I assume the ICANN schedule is correct, and it?s on > for the Monday?**** > > ** ** > > I also see that the ICANN schedule has us down for our interaction with > the community from 4.30-6 on the Monday. The last schedule I remember > seeing had this down for 2-3.30, and this still is the time listed on the > link in the attached. I have no problem with the later time, and am really > just wanting to confirm it for my calendar ? does anyone know which is > correct? I also note that the earlier schedule had us down for an > internal/team debrief from 4-5.30, which would have been after the > community interaction in the earlier schedule. Assuming we?re now meeting > from 4.30-6, are we still planning to do a debrief afterwards, at a later > time? I apologise if I?ve missed some discussions on this and should > already know the answer, but I?m just trying to get my calendar sorted, so > any help would be appreciated.**** > > ** ** > > On a different track, I seem to have lost track of submissions to our > discussion paper - I recall we had received a couple of informal > submissions/comments, but I can?t seem to find them anywhere beyond > archived emails, and I hadn?t seen anything further for a while. Have we > received any/many submissions yet, and if so are they accessible in a > centralised place, so that I can catch up on my reading before our > discussions in Costa Rica?**** > > ** ** > > Lastly, and just for information, I?ll have a number of overlaps in Costa > Rica with GAC meetings (as is usually the case). Unfortunately, this will > mean that I will have to miss much of Sunday?s WHOIS meeting, although I > will try to resolve part of the overlap at the GAC end so that I can attend > the meeting with the GNSO Council from 5.30-6.30. I should then be ok for > dinner Sunday if it goes ahead, all of Monday?s sessions (at either time), > Tuesday?s meeting with the GAC, and most of the Wednesday meeting (I?m > hoping to be at the WHOIS meeting most of the day, but will have to leave > by 2 at the latest).**** > > ** ** > > I apologise for the long email (!), and look forward to seeing you all > soon.**** > > ** ** > > Cheers,**** > > ** ** > > Peter**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] *On > Behalf Of *Denise Michel > *Sent:* Thursday, 1 March 2012 4:04 PM > *To:* rt4-whois at icann.org > *Subject:* [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica**** > > ** ** > > Dear Team Members, > > The Costa Rica schedule has been posted: > http://costarica43.icann.org/full-schedule > > In addition to the meetings/events you requested, you also may be > interested in:**** > > - "Compliance Sessions" (informational update) - Monday**** > - "RAA Progress Report and WHOIS Data Validation" workshop (update on > RAA negotiations; discussion of data validation mechanisms) - Tuesday** > ** > - "Consumer Trust" workshop (involving new gTLDs and 4th AoC review) - > Wednesday**** > - "Replacement of WHOIS" workshop (IDN Whois focus) - Thursday**** > > > Regards,**** > > Denise**** > > > Denise Michel > ICANN > Advisor to the President & CEO > denise.michel at icann.org > +1.408.429.3072 mobile > +1.310.578.8632 direct**** > > > * > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy > all > copies of the original message. > > This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. > MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, > undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway > products please visit www.axway.com. > > * > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Alice Jansen" > To: "rt4-whois at icann.org" > Cc: > Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:45:03 +1100 > Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica schedule > Dear Review Team Members, > > Please find enclosed the most recent version of your Costa Rican > schedule also available at: > https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/San+Jose+Meeting > Rest assured that outlook invitations will be circulated as soon as > locations are confirmed. Bridge details will be sent to those participating > remotely. > Emily and Kathy are currently in the process of finalizing draft agendas. > > Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions or > concerns. > > Thanks, > > Kind regards > > Alice > *Sunday * > > *13:00-17:30* -- WHOIS Review Team Meeting > > Description: This is the WHOIS Policy Review Team's working session. > Public attendance is welcome but comments should be submitted during the > Interaction with the Community Session scheduled for Monday, 12 March, > 14:00-15:30 or through its public comment box at: > http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05dec11-en.htm > > *17:30-18:30 *-- WHOIS Review Team ? GNSO Council meeting > > *19:30-22:00* -- WHOIS Policy Review Team dinner > > Location TBD > *Monday* > > *07:30-09:30* -- WHOIS Review Team Breakfast (in preparation for > afternoon public session) - *CLOSED* > > *14:00-15:30 *-- WHOIS Interaction with the Community > > Description: Presentation of draft final report recommendations for the > community's consideration and feedback. For more information please refer > to: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-05dec11-en.htm > > *16:00-17:30* -- WHOIS Internal Debriefing - *CLOSED* > *Tuesday* > > *11:00-12:00* -- WHOIS Review Team - GAC meeting > *Wednesday* > > *08:00-17:00* -- WHOIS Policy Review Team Meeting > > *09:15-10:15* -- WHOIS Review Team - Board of Directors meeting > > *NOTE: Emily needs to leave at 3:00 PM. Aim to stop the session then but > schedule makes allowance for more time, which Kathy will chair, if need be. > * > > Description: This is the WHOIS Policy Review Team's working session. > Public attendance is welcome but comments should be submitted during the > Interaction with the Community Session scheduled for Monday, 12 March, > 14:00-15:30 or through its public comment box at: > http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05dec11-en.htm > -- > *Alice Jansen* > Assistant, Organizational Reviews > *6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5* > *B-1040 Brussels* > *Belgium* > Direct dial: +32 2 234 78 64 > Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56 > Skype: alice_jansen_icann > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120302/3e5badfe/attachment.html From Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au Sun Mar 4 22:50:11 2012 From: Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au (Nettlefold, Peter) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:50:11 +1100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] In-Reply-To: References: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A3351C5F93B@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Message-ID: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A3351C5FF78@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Thanks very much Denise - that's really helpful. Cheers, Peter From: michel.denise at gmail.com [mailto:michel.denise at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Denise Michel Sent: Saturday, 3 March 2012 7:18 AM To: Nettlefold, Peter Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Hello, Peter. The RAA Progress Report & Whois Validation Workshop is indeed on Monday. Sorry about my typo. The authoritative schedule is the one posted: http://costarica43.icann.org/full-schedule The Team's public forum had to be slotted a bit later in the afternoon due to scheduling issues with the ballroom. This will necessitate changing the time for the Team's internal debrief meeting. Alice & Olof will follow-up with some alternatives for this. The publicly submitted comments on the draft report are posted here: http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-rt-draft-final-report/ Alice is collecting informal input as directed. Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Nettlefold, Peter > wrote: Hi Denise and review team colleagues, I'm writing to check a few things in relation to the meeting schedule and preparations for Costa Rica. I expect that the first is just a typo, but I wanted to double check - Denise, you mention below the 'RAA progress report and WHOIS data validation' workshop is on Tuesday, but on the ICANN schedule it's down for 1-3pm on the Monday - I assume the ICANN schedule is correct, and it's on for the Monday? I also see that the ICANN schedule has us down for our interaction with the community from 4.30-6 on the Monday. The last schedule I remember seeing had this down for 2-3.30, and this still is the time listed on the link in the attached. I have no problem with the later time, and am really just wanting to confirm it for my calendar - does anyone know which is correct? I also note that the earlier schedule had us down for an internal/team debrief from 4-5.30, which would have been after the community interaction in the earlier schedule. Assuming we're now meeting from 4.30-6, are we still planning to do a debrief afterwards, at a later time? I apologise if I've missed some discussions on this and should already know the answer, but I'm just trying to get my calendar sorted, so any help would be appreciated. On a different track, I seem to have lost track of submissions to our discussion paper - I recall we had received a couple of informal submissions/comments, but I can't seem to find them anywhere beyond archived emails, and I hadn't seen anything further for a while. Have we received any/many submissions yet, and if so are they accessible in a centralised place, so that I can catch up on my reading before our discussions in Costa Rica? Lastly, and just for information, I'll have a number of overlaps in Costa Rica with GAC meetings (as is usually the case). Unfortunately, this will mean that I will have to miss much of Sunday's WHOIS meeting, although I will try to resolve part of the overlap at the GAC end so that I can attend the meeting with the GNSO Council from 5.30-6.30. I should then be ok for dinner Sunday if it goes ahead, all of Monday's sessions (at either time), Tuesday's meeting with the GAC, and most of the Wednesday meeting (I'm hoping to be at the WHOIS meeting most of the day, but will have to leave by 2 at the latest). I apologise for the long email (!), and look forward to seeing you all soon. Cheers, Peter From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Denise Michel Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2012 4:04 PM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica Dear Team Members, The Costa Rica schedule has been posted: http://costarica43.icann.org/full-schedule In addition to the meetings/events you requested, you also may be interested in: * "Compliance Sessions" (informational update) - Monday * "RAA Progress Report and WHOIS Data Validation" workshop (update on RAA negotiations; discussion of data validation mechanisms) - Tuesday * "Consumer Trust" workshop (involving new gTLDs and 4th AoC review) - Wednesday * "Replacement of WHOIS" workshop (IDN Whois focus) - Thursday Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Alice Jansen" > To: "rt4-whois at icann.org" > Cc: Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 23:45:03 +1100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Costa Rica schedule Dear Review Team Members, Please find enclosed the most recent version of your Costa Rican schedule also available at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/San+Jose+Meeting Rest assured that outlook invitations will be circulated as soon as locations are confirmed. Bridge details will be sent to those participating remotely. Emily and Kathy are currently in the process of finalizing draft agendas. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thanks, Kind regards Alice Sunday 13:00-17:30 -- WHOIS Review Team Meeting Description: This is the WHOIS Policy Review Team's working session. Public attendance is welcome but comments should be submitted during the Interaction with the Community Session scheduled for Monday, 12 March, 14:00-15:30 or through its public comment box at: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05dec11-en.htm 17:30-18:30 -- WHOIS Review Team - GNSO Council meeting 19:30-22:00 -- WHOIS Policy Review Team dinner Location TBD Monday 07:30-09:30 -- WHOIS Review Team Breakfast (in preparation for afternoon public session) - CLOSED 14:00-15:30 -- WHOIS Interaction with the Community Description: Presentation of draft final report recommendations for the community's consideration and feedback. For more information please refer to: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-05dec11-en.htm 16:00-17:30 -- WHOIS Internal Debriefing - CLOSED Tuesday 11:00-12:00 -- WHOIS Review Team - GAC meeting Wednesday 08:00-17:00 -- WHOIS Policy Review Team Meeting 09:15-10:15 -- WHOIS Review Team - Board of Directors meeting NOTE: Emily needs to leave at 3:00 PM. Aim to stop the session then but schedule makes allowance for more time, which Kathy will chair, if need be. Description: This is the WHOIS Policy Review Team's working session. Public attendance is welcome but comments should be submitted during the Interaction with the Community Session scheduled for Monday, 12 March, 14:00-15:30 or through its public comment box at: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/whois-rt-draft-final-report-05dec11-en.htm -- Alice Jansen Assistant, Organizational Reviews 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5 B-1040 Brussels Belgium Direct dial: +32 2 234 78 64 Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56 Skype: alice_jansen_icann ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120305/dc7e4c33/attachment.html