[Rt4-whois] For discussion Recommendation 5

[Emily Taylor]

Nicely done, Susan

Thank you.

How about "substantial failure or full failure (as defined in the..."



On 11 April 2012 17:33, Susan Kawaguchi <susank at fb.com> wrote:

>   I reviewed the NORC study again it was a good refresher.    In my mind
> we have at least two choices in wording on the rec. as the comments
> indicated we do not use the same terminology in the recommendation as the
> study did.
>  Current language
>
>
>    1.
>
>    ICANN should take appropriate measures to reduce the number of unreachable
>    WHOIS registrations (as defined by the NORC Data Accuracy Study,
>    2009/10) by 50% within 12 months and by 50% again over the following 12
>    months.
>
>
>     ICANN should take appropriate measures to reduce the number of undeliverable
>    (also mentions unreliable) WHOIS registrations (as defined by the NORC
>    Data Accuracy Study, 2009/10) by 50% within 12 months and by 50% again over
>    the following 12 months
>
>
>     I think it would be abundantly clear if we used the term substantial
>    failure in the recommendation
>
>    ICANN should take appropriate measures to reduce the number of WHOIS
>    registrations with a substantial failure (as defined by the NORC Data
>    Accuracy Study, 2009/10) by 50% within 12 months and by 50% again over the
>    following 12 months
>
>
>     Page 3 of the study outlines Accuracy Groups
>
>
>              Margin of error (4)
>
>    No failure
>
>    Met all three criteria fully - deliverable address, name linked to
>    address, and registrant confirmed ownership and correctness of all details
>    during interview
>
>    353
>
>    23,117,442
>
>    22.8%
>
>    1.4%
>
>    Minimal failure
>
>    All criteria met but minor fault noted by registrant during interview
>
>    17
>
>    1,101,176
>
>    1.1%
>
>    0.2%
>
>    Name unable to be linked to address, but able to locate registrant and
>    confirm ownership
>
>    312
>
>    23,024,007
>
>    22.7%
>
>    2.2%
>
>    Limited failure
>
>    Deliverable address, name linked and/or located, but unable to
>    interview registrant to obtain confirmation.
>
>    365
>
>    24,893,476
>
>    24.6%
>
>    1.7%
>
>    Substantial failure
>
>    Undeliverable address and/or unlinkable name, however registrant
>    located. Unable to interview registrant to obtain confirmation.
>
>    109
>
>    7,202,472
>
>    7.1%
>
>    0.9%
>
>    Deliverable address, but unable to link or even locate the registrant,
>    removing any chance of interview.
>
>    177
>
>    13,949,721
>
>    13.8%
>
>    2.2%
>
>    Full failure
>
>    Failed on all criteria - undeliverable address and unlinkable,
>    missing, or patently false name, unable to locate to interview
>
>    Susan Kawaguchi
>
>  Domain Name Manager
> Facebook Legal Dept.
>
>   Phone - 650 485-6064
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>


-- 




*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120411/8e539c86/attachment.html