[Rt4-whois] Attached - Executive summary

[Alice Jansen]

Dear Review Team Members,

I have inserted the data validation text into the executive summary
following Emily's request.
Attached you will find the most recent version of the executive summary -
also available at: 
https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Final+Report

Thanks,

Kind regards

Alice 
-- 
Alice Jansen

Organizational Reviews Manager
6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5
B-1040 Brussels
Belgium
Direct dial: +32 2 234 78 64
Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56
Skype: alice_jansen_icann


On 4/29/12 7:10 PM, "Smith, Bill" <bill.smith at paypal-inc.com> wrote:

>Read it, agree. One suggested change and a comment for a change.
>
>1) Request changing number in the IP address section to number.
>2) RFC for WHOIS is not plicy
>
>See attached for specifics.
>
>
>On Apr 28, 2012, at 4:59 AM, Emily Taylor wrote:
>
>Dear all
>
>Thank you Kathy for your work on combining our discussions, findings and
>recommendations into a single document along with the Executive Summary.
>
>I have gone through it all now, and attach a marked up draft, which I
>hope does the following:
>
>1.  I have marked as accepted all the text which I believe has been
>agreed by the team on our previous calls - that is the wording of
>findings and recommendations on strategic priority, data accuracy, most
>of the wording on privacy proxy (apart from last para), the common
>interface, and the new ones at the end on progress reporting.  I may have
>got this wrong, and hope that others will review carefully.
>
>2. I have marked up new text:
>
>- there were some sections of the old exec summary which I thought we
>could reintroduce since they make important points on (1) consensus
>building and (2) consumer trust.
>
>- The text on strategic priority which is new, recalls our agreement on
>the last call.  This is basically Susan's text.  Having reviewed the
>whole recommendation, it makes sense (I think) to pull out some duplicate
>ideas (on incentives), and also to put the reporting bit at the end.
>
>- I added a few words into Kathy's new text introducing Outreach (rec 3).
> I like Kathy's text and recommend that it is accepted.
>
>- Whole new section on Compliance.  As reported on our last call, we've
>had an outline in circulation for some time, but only had the opportunity
>to discuss in our small team yesterday.  This is our proposal, which is
>lifted from the larger chapter that was circulated yesterday.
>
>- I added the WDRP text (which was quite a popular draft recommendation!)
>into data accuracy recommendations.  I recall from our discussions in
>Costa Rica that we agreed it was a bit out of place as the second
>recommendation, and that it fitted better as a sub-section on accuracy.
>Having put in that recommendation, I saw that we had no text in the
>findings to anchor it.  Taking Kathy's approach, I found the paragraph in
>our original draft report (Compliance chapter - findings), which
>described the problem we perceive.
>
>- The paragraph on data validation (drafted by James, Lynn and me) is now
>at the end of the findings on data accuracy, as agreed on our last call.
>
>Otherwise, I recommend Kathy's changes are accepted (I've left them
>marked up so all can see and comment).
>
>Lastly, Kathy - you asked about "de-accreditation", and my recollection
>is that we noted James' draft and helpful explanations on this, and
>agreed that we didn't need to go further or add new text into the
>recommendations. Again, if I've misunderstood, please shout.
>
>All: Would be grateful for your input on this as soon as possible.  Even
>if it's a short e-mail saying "I read it; I agree" ;-)
>
>
>
>Kind regards
>
>Emily
>
>
>
>--
>
>
>   [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif]
>
>
>
>76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
>t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 € m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
>emily at emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>
>
>www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk/>
>
>Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
>Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.
>
><Executive summary et kk
>ed.docx>_______________________________________________
>Rt4-whois mailing list
>Rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois at icann.org>
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Executive summaryv4.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 61634 bytes
Desc: Executive summaryv4.docx
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120430/1a7cd2e6/Executivesummaryv4.docx