[Rt4-whois] Fwd: Whole report - a proposal [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Kathy Kleiman]

Sorry, I can't picture it. Is there a redline?
Tx!
Kathy'
:
>
> Hi Emily,
>
> Thanks for clarifying.  The new findings text was finely balanced in 
> places, so I think your approach of leaving it untouched seems 
> sensible to me.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
> *From:*rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Emily Taylor
> *Sent:* Thursday, 3 May 2012 9:30 PM
> *To:* rt4-whois at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Rt4-whois] Fwd: Whole report - a proposal
>
> Hi All
>
> I have now done this. Basically just copy pasted anything that was 
> missing.
>
> Looking carefully at proxy/privacy, it seems that the work moved on 
> between our draft and full report, and have therefore deleted the old 
> "conclusions" on privacy proxy, and left instead the Findings as they 
> were carefully negotiated recently.
>
> Shout if you disagree.
>
> E
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Emily Taylor* <emily at emilytaylor.eu <mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>>
> Date: 3 May 2012 12:07
> Subject: Whole report - a proposal
> To: rt4-whois at icann.org <mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>
>
>
> Hi there
>
> Alice has pulled together all the new text into the old document, and 
> of course there are some issues with integration.
>
> I will go through the entire text carefully as soon as possible, but 
> want to highlight one item for you.  Please raise any objections to my 
> proposal below as soon as poss:
>
> The section "Conclusions" in the draft report mostly reproduces our 
> new "findings" but not always.  So, the text for IDNs, Compliance, 
> data accuracy largely maps what was originally there.  One area where 
> it our old conclusions are more expansive is "privacy and proxy".  I 
> suggest that Kathy and/or I combine the Conclusions with Findings.  
> Where the text is the same, fine.  Where it is different, we will copy 
> it over, unless it is inconsistent with our amended recommendations.
>
> It should just be copy paste job, but I will let you know of any text 
> changes.
>
> E
>
>
> -- 
>
>
> __
>
> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
> t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 <tel:%2B44%20%280%291865%20582%20811> . m: +44 
> (0)7540 049 322 <tel:%2B44%20%280%297540%20049%20322>
> emily at emilytaylor.eu <mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>
>
> *www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk>*
>
> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England 
> and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
>
> __
>
> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
> t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 . m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
> emily at emilytaylor.eu <mailto:emily at emilytaylor.eu>
>
> *www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk>*
>
> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England 
> and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.
>
>
> *-------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended 
> recipient(s)
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and 
> destroy all
> copies of the original message.
>
> This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate.
> MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, 
> undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway 
> products please visit www.axway.com.
>
> *-------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois


-- 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20120503/3330aa81/attachment.html