[RZERC] [Ext] Re: openness and transparency

[Howard Eland]

+1

-Howard

> On Feb 9, 2017, at 9:52 AM, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Jim and Carlos! Thoughts from other RZERC members on this subject? 
> 
> Best
> Steve
> 
> On 2/8/17, 8:27 AM, "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos at lacnic.net> wrote:
> 
>    +1, I agree with this position.
> 
>    Carlos M. Martinez
>    CTO - Gerente de Tecnología
>    LACNIC
>    On 8 Feb 2017, at 4:52, Jim Reid wrote:
> 
>>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 16:08, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We would like to add an agenda item for the next teleconference: 
>>> “How open and transparent should the RZERC be?” Please share your 
>>> thoughts on the list as well.
>> 
>> I’d like RZERC to publish everything -- minutes, papers, list 
>> traffic, transcripts, recordings, whatever -- as a matter of routine.
>> 
>> Confidential or sensitive topics can be redacted as and when they 
>> arise: “the committee went into executive session to discuss a 
>> confidential matter” or something like that. Though it might be 
>> tidier to have those executive sessions as standalone events so they 
>> don’t get intermingled with routine RZERC business that can be 
>> freely published.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> RZERC mailing list
>> RZERC at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rzerc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RZERC mailing list
> RZERC at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rzerc