[RZERC] RZERC Charter Review Meeting on 3 May

[Geoff Huston]

Following referral of this question to the SSAC, I can convey the response
that for SSAC the view is that a rough consensus is appropriate, bolstered by
procedural controls and documentation that underlie the path taken to reach
this rough consensus. The onus is on the chair to ensure that there has been
a full and complete airing of all the issues during the path to achieve this
rough consensus.

thanks,

  Geoff

> On 30 Apr 2022, at 3:20 am, Danielle Rutherford via RZERC <rzerc at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear RZERC Members,
>  
> The last discussion on the RZERC charter review concluded with members agreeing to consult with their appointing orgs on the topic of consensus for the RZERC Charter Review.  As the Committee needs to determine the consensus method before continuing with the charter review work can you please let me know if you’ve been able to engage with your appointing org on consensus. If the majority of members have not gotten feedback from their appointing org, we will cancel the meeting on 3 May and reconvene on 17 May.
>  
> Best,
> Danielle
> _______________________________________________
> RZERC mailing list
> RZERC at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rzerc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.