[Ssr2-review] Please review the first 5 SSR1 recommendations for the call tomorrow
housley at vigilsec.com
Wed Oct 10 15:37:35 UTC 2018
I must say that I am a bit confused by your note.
First, we talked about the reading at the face-to-face meeting in August. So, by this time, I hope that all RT members have read the SSR-related part of the ICANN Bylaws, the SSR1 report, the SSR1 implementation report, the ICANN Strategic plan, and the ICANN SSR framework.
Second, I would expect the person that signed up to facilitate the discussion of a particular SSR1 recommendation has reviewed the context in the SSR1 report. Others should do the same.
Third, you point out the three focus areas in the SSR1 report. Are you suggesting this provides a better order for us to cover the recommendations? If so, I think the unanswered questions is forcing us to skip some for the time being. If not, then I did not understand your point at all; please try again.
> On Oct 4, 2018, at 2:35 AM, ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net> wrote:
> This mail below did not get the expected traction. But once again, i want to emphazise the followings:
> 1- we should not be taken the recommendations without referring to their context in the SSR1 report
> 2- The SSR1 recommendations are related to the 3 focus areas below used by the SSR1 team for their review
> 3- it is therefore important that we make sure everybody read the SSR1 report, the 28 recommendations implementation report, but also the ICANN Strategic plan, the ICANN SSR framework which are influenced by the implementation of some the SSR1 recommendations.
> Hope this helps
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> From: ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net <mailto:aalain at trstech.net>>
>> Subject: Re: [Ssr2-review] Please review the first 5 SSR1 recommendations for the call tomorrow
>> Date: 13 September 2018 at 13:15:16 GMT
>> To: Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com <mailto:housley at vigilsec.com>>
>> Cc: ICANN SSR2 <ssr2-review at icann.org <mailto:ssr2-review at icann.org>>
>>> On 10 Sep 2018, at 18:31, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com <mailto:housley at vigilsec.com>> wrote:
>>> Last week, we talked about the information that we need to collect in a table. I put together a template for the table, and asked the vice chairs to review it. Attached is the resulting structure for the table. At this point, I invite the whole review team to review it. Is there anything that we need to capture that this does not capture?
>> To ease the comprehension and the assessment of the recommendations and their implementation, it may be good to add to the table the focus area and may be sub-focus area of the recommendation.
>> The SSR1 used 3 focus area:
>> 1- Scope and Structure of ICANN’s SSR Responsibilities
>> 2- Effectiveness and Implementation of the SSR Framework.
>> 3- Understanding the Risk Landscape and Contingency Planning
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ssr2-review