[Ssr2-review] Please prepare for the plenary call on Thursday

[k claffy]

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 02:24:50PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
 > Please review it.  Please raise any issues or concerns on the mail list.
 > See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qUxV4L-gS5xHmC4QQPGRk81MgQuhQvsbnEU7xxe8DDY/edit


There is still a "clarification sought" that someone on the
RT was supposed to answer?  did Laruin?

(The following applies to all recommendations, and is 
something for the editing phase, but it's not clear the editor
can do it without clarity of content from whoever did the 
research/note-taking.)

(1) The claim "The assessment is based on reviewing the documents"
should make clear exactly what documents were reviwed in this
assessment, with titles and dates attached.  You mean your 
whole assessment was just with doc [1] listed below?
That seems inconsistent with the text above..

(2) In general, there are Yes or No questions for each sub-part,
so our answers should have "Yes" or "No", or we should decide
what are other viable answers.  Rec 4 is an example where we
have not done so.

Rest looks great. 


 > 2) In Barcelona we talked abut the topics in the Internal Facing work stream.
 > 
 > See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Eaj92r_ZbGBqO-2t3-tJv4Teqtix20Dly7C14XKj4eg/edit#heading=h.gjdgxs and https://community.icann.org/display/SSR/Subgroup+%232+-+ICANN+SSR
 > 
 > Before the pause, there was a lot of information collected here: https://trello.com/b/5Eu1ppuv/ssr2-subtopic-2-icann-ssr
 > 
 > Please review this material.  Are there any questions we need to ask?  We will need volunteers to start writing text.  Please be ready to volunteer for some writing.



sorry, i was probably sleeping in the wrong time zone when this
decision was made, but I find the new "Internally Facing" name
of this group to be a misleading.  Contractual Compliance,
probably the most resource-intensive topic in here, is definitely
not facing internally to ICANN.

the old term seemed more appropriate: these are things that
are, by community consensus, SSR activities lead by ICANN.
They are not even mostly internally facing.


 > 3) In Barcelona KC agreed to propose a set of topics for the External Facing work stream.  It will be a merge of several working documents.  KC said that she would send something out on Wednesday.  Please review it when it comes to your mailbox.  Think about what information needs to be gathered to cover those topics.


So, two goals hee:

1) review of WorkStream 4 subtopics with an eye toward potentially
integrating some of them into WorkStream 3

Eric and I jsut took a pass over that; the result is some 
strikethrough on the current version of WorkStream 4 in the
"Working Document SSR2 topics":
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Eaj92r_ZbGBqO-2t3-tJv4Teqtix20Dly7C14XKj4eg/
to be discussed tomorrow before we actually move them into
Workstream 3 (or delete).


2) Integrate geoff's distillation of salient points re DNS SSR 
from his meeting with ICANN (Kim Davies): 
	https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KWvdcZ2g8hBxUzvzPqgzVmsT4RZ5CbIo-N2IpUUYuAw/
and integration of relevant material into Workstream 3. 

As far as I'm concerned, all of these topics should be folded into
WorkStream 3, though the formats of the two documents currently differ
so I'm not inclined to just cut and paste.   If the larger team
considers this appropriate, the sub-team for this workstream wilil 
take it as an action item for next week (or realistically it might 
take two weeks, i'm fully booked next week).  anyone interested in 
being on this subteam should speak up in the next week or two.

k