[Ssr2-review] Please review the first 5 SSR1 recommendations for the call tomorrow

Naveed Bin Rais naveedbinrais at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 13:32:37 UTC 2018


Hi everyone,

Due to some urgent domestic commitments, I won't be able to join today's
meeting. Please accept my apologies. I shall follow up through transcripts
and mailing list.

Naveed -

On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, 17:15 ALAIN AINA, <aalain at trstech.net> wrote:

> Russ,
>
> On 10 Sep 2018, at 18:31, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>
> Last week, we talked about the information that we need to collect in a
> table.  I put together a template for the table, and asked the vice chairs
> to review it.  Attached is the resulting structure for the table.  At this
> point, I invite the whole review team to review it.  Is there anything that
> we need to capture that this does not capture?
>
>
>
> To ease the comprehension and the assessment  of the recommendations and
> their implementation, it may be good to add to the table the  focus area
> and may be sub-focus area of the recommendation.
>
> The SSR1  used 3 focus area:
>
> 1- Scope and Structure of ICANN’s SSR Responsibilities
>
> 2- Effectiveness and Implementation of the SSR Framework.
>
> 3- Understanding the Risk Landscape and Contingency Planning
>
> Example in the attached file…
>
>
> HTH
>
> —Alain
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Sep 5, 2018, at 1:15 PM, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>
> As part of the agenda for tomorrow, we will be looking over the SSR1
> recommendations.  We will take them each in turn.  I doubt we will get
> through more that five on the call tomorrow, so if you are prepared to talk
> about the first five, that should be adequate preparation.
>
> The Bylaws are pretty clear about our task regarding the SSR1
> recommendations.
>
>  Section 4.6  (c) (iv) The SSR Review Team shall also assess the extent to
> which
>  prior SSR Review recommendations have been implemented and the extent
>  to which implementation of such recommendations has resulted in the
>  intended effect.
>
> At the face-to-face meeting in Washington, I shared a way of thinking
> about this task.  I repeat it here in the hopes it will be easier to
> prepare for tomorrow's call.
>
>  Was there an attempt to implement the recommendation?
>  (In all cases, the answer is "yes")
>
>  Is the recommendation still relevant today?
>  If not, write a short statement saying that it has been overcome by
> events.
>  If so, assess whether the implementation has the intended effect.
>
>     If so, write a short statement saying so.
>     if not, is this something we want to see more work on?
>
>        If so, write an SSR2 recommendation about it.
>        If not, write a short statement with the reason.
>
> I look forward to our call tomorrow.
>
> Russ
>
>
> <SSR1-Rec-Table-v04.docx>
> _______________________________________________
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20180913/d592b732/attachment.html>


More information about the Ssr2-review mailing list