[SubPro-IRT] Application Fee FAQ

[Rubens Kuhl]

> Em 12 de jun. de 2024, à(s) 23:59, Rubens Kuhl via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt at icann.org> escreveu:
> 
> 
> 
>> Em 12 de jun. de 2024, à(s) 09:01, Next Round Policy Implementation <NextRound_PolicyImplementation at icann.org> escreveu:
>> 
>> Dear IRT members, 
>>  
>> In preparation for tomorrow's IRT meeting <https://community.icann.org/x/zIBAEw>, ICANN org has prepared the attached FAQ which aims to address the various questions that have been raised both in relation to the RSP fee as well as the gTLD evaluation fee.
>>  
>> Best regards,
>> Elisa
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> - In item 3, it’s mentioned that TMCH fees are not included. In 2012, registries got their TMCH fees back after being initially charged, so in effect, there was no additional payment of TMCH fees beyond the application fee. Changing that is not supported by any SubPro recommendation. 


Specifically on TMCH fees, after help from another gTLD registry I can provide the following links:

RySG Correspondence: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/diaz-to-atallah-03oct17-en.pdf
(It contains other fee-related matters but only TMCH is in discussion here)


ICANN Board Resolution: https://www.icann.org/en/board-activities-and-meetings/materials/approved-resolutions-regular-meeting-of-the-icann-board-13-05-2018-en#2

And the point here is that this established a line of action from 2012, and there is no SubPro recommendation (or any Board decision for that matter) to change that. 


Rubens

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/subpro-irt/attachments/20240614/d93b7a7f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/subpro-irt/attachments/20240614/d93b7a7f/signature.asc>