[SubPro-IRT] GAC Advice on Private Auctions and ICANN Last-Resort Auctions

Mon Jun 24 20:46:24 UTC 2024

Sam,
I take your point that ICANN can't prohibit applicants from agreeing as to
what they will bid in a mandated ICANN auction.  Don't see how ICANN could
stop them from doing that unless it's a requirement that the bidder certify
that it has not made an agreement with any third party or affiliate as to
the amount it will bid or what it will do with the gTLD if it wins the
bid.  An eligibility rule for participating in an ICANN auction?  If
breached, you lose and move to the next bidder?  How would anyone find
out?  And when would they find out - years after launch?

Anne

Anne Aikman-Scalese
GNSO Councilor
NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2024
anneicanngnso at gmail.com

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:16 PM Sam Lanfranco <samlanfranco at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I am not in favor of private auctions but I have yet to hear of a way to
> make prevention operational.
>
> What do the lawyers among us have to say here?
>
> Sam L.
>
> Internet Elder, Internet Ecologist
> On Jun 20, 2024, at 3:07 p.m., trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com wrote:
>>
>> Personally,  I think that permitting private auctions in the next round
>> will completely distort and destroy it as the majority of applications will
>> be speculative in nature trying to get a payout via private auction.  We
>> already know anecdotally that there are a number of people setting up funds
>> to do this and many others have already publicly expressed an interest in
>> doing this.  And certain strings are obvious targets.  This will junk up
>> the process, waste ICANN resources, and increase time and cost for all
>> applicants, and be detrimental to the general public.  Frankly, I don’t
>> know anyone that thinks permitting private auctions is a good idea and will
>> be beneficial other than those who have expressed interest in participating
>> in them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Of course it is a different question of *how* to prohibit private
>> auctions. I am not sure how this can be effectively accomplished.  Maybe we
>> prohibit all private resolution of contention sets for monetary (or
>> equivalent) consideration other than the ICANN  auction of last resort.
>> Could applicants still do this secretly – of course.  But if they wee found
>> out, the winner could lose its TLD. If we all think that having private
>> auctions is detrimental then we should take steps here to prohibit them, as
>> ICANN is not doing so (although they have expressed concern) and have
>> kicked it back to the GNSO.  Yes of course there will be ways to game any
>> method we choose but the possibility of gaming is too often used in
>> ICANN-land as a reason/excuse not to do things and to keep the status quo.
>> The reality is that any system/rule/process can be gamed and the best we
>> can do is try to set up the process to reduce opportunities for gaming and
>> increase penalties for doing so.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> *Marc H. Trachtenberg *
>> Shareholder
>>
>> Chair, Internet, Domain Name, e-Commerce and Social Media Practice
>> Greenberg Traurig, LLP
>> 77 West Wacker Drive | Suite 3100 | Chicago, IL 60601
>> T +1 312.456.1020
>>
>> M +1 773.677.3305
>> trac at gtlaw.com <trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com> | www.gtlaw.com | View GT
>> Biography <https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/t/trachtenberg-marc-h>
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Greenberg Traurig Logo]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Sam
>> Lanfranco
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 20, 2024 1:20 PM
>> *To:* subpro-irt at icann.org
>> *Subject:* [SubPro-IRT] GAC Advice on Private Auctions and ICANN
>> Last-Resort Auctions
>>
>>
>>
>> **EXTERNAL TO GT**
>>
>> Comment by Sam Lanfranco
>>
>> I do not believe that the GAC understands the complexities in its advice
>> with regard to not using auctions in the resolution of contention sets.
>>
>> FIRST: Once a contention set is determined, there is really no mechanism
>> by which the contenders can work out a resolution on their own that can be
>> prevented by ICANN. In a contention set an agreed payment scheme would
>> avoid an auction, but an auction ban could not be enforced. Even insisting
>> on an ICANN auction of last resort could not prevent a prior agreement
>> between contending parties, and the ICANN auction would just a formality in
>> terms of a private agreement.
>>
>> SECOND:  Auctions exist to solve a problem of excess demand for unique
>> (non-fungible) commodities. A gTLD is a unique supply of one item, the
>> thing being sought is right to be the registry for that one item (vertical
>> supply line at Q = 1). Money as the numéraire in which the price is
>> expressed and the auction as a way of selecting a buyer when there are
>> competing interests are a “form follows function” solution to the competing
>> interests. It was invented precisely for this purpose when there is no
>> overriding reason to award the "item" (gTLD registry) to any one contender.
>>
>> GAC proposed no alternatives to resolving the contention set without an
>> auction. Any alternative would require a consensus on an outside agent who
>> would have neither regulatory guidelines not case law to reach a decision.
>> That would mean that there are no objective criteria for selecting an
>> outside agent.
>>
>> My view here would be to explain this to GAC, and politely ask if they
>> have guidance on how an acceptable outside agent might be identified. In
>> the end I see no way around an ICANN auction of last resort, even if there
>> is a way of preventing a private resolution within the contenders in the
>> contention set. This situation is precisely why humans with agency created
>> auctions in the first place.
>>
>> Sam Lanfranco
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged
>> information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at
>> postmaster at gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> SubPro-IRT mailing list
> SubPro-IRT at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/subpro-irt
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/subpro-irt/attachments/20240624/ecd43eac/attachment-0001.html>