[TSG-Access-RD] Proposed Assumption Additions

[Francisco Arias]

Re: #6, it should be core RDAP RFCs only (i.e., not the drafts since they are not part of the standard). And we may need to say that the only RDAP extensions we are going to consider are regarding authentication, authorization, auditing.

Re: #7, I think we only need to assume that redaction of certain fields will continue beyond the temp spec.

-- 
Francisco

On 12/18/18, 10:22 AM, "TSG-Access-RD on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott via TSG-Access-RD" <tsg-access-rd-bounces at icann.org on behalf of tsg-access-rd at icann.org> wrote:

    As discussed on today's call:
    
    6.      We are limited to RDAP capabilities as specified in the core RDAP RFCs and published Internet-Draft documents.
    7.      The method of redaction and display of non-public data as described in the temporary specification for WHOIS will be expected to be implemented in RDAP.
    
    Scott