[TSG-Access-RD] Notes from TSG-Access-RD Meeting #6 - 5 Feb 2019

[Jody Kolker]

<<
1. b. should be modified as such: The system MUST support a distributed data model, where data is stored by the CPHs and only non-public data is transferred through ICANN.
>>

Designing a system with this requirement will mean that CPHs will require that ICANN enters into a legal agreement with CPHs to provide indemnification for any fines incurred due to infractions to GDPR that are caused by the release of private data through this system.  Without this agreement, CPHs will be unwilling to return private data to this system.

Can anyone speak for ICANN’s willingness to enter into this type of agreement?  If not, going forward with the design of this type of system might not make sense.

Thanks,
Jody Kolker

From: TSG-Access-RD <tsg-access-rd-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Diana Middleton
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 9:17 AM
To: Technical Study Group RD <tsg-access-rd at icann.org>
Subject: [TSG-Access-RD] Notes from TSG-Access-RD Meeting #6 - 5 Feb 2019

Dear all,

See below for notes from meeting #6.  Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best,
Diana

**************************

Technical Study Group on Access to Non-Public Registration Data
Meeting #6
5 February 2019
0900 PST / 1200 EST / 1700 UTC

Attendees:  Jorge Cano, Tomofumi Okubo, Steve Crocker, Andy Newton, Scott Hollenbeck, Jody Kolker, Murray Kucherawy, Benedict Addis, Ram Mohan, Diana Middleton, Eleeza Agopian, John Crain, Francisco Arias, Yvette Guigneaux

Apologies:  Gavin Brown, Gustavo Lozano

During this call we discussed the following items:

Review of Unified Requirements:

1. b. should be modified as such: The system MUST support a distributed data model, where data is stored by the CPHs and only non-public data is transferred through ICANN.

2.e. should be modified to remove “email” as such: The system MUST provide notifications of the progress of a request through the triage-review-fulfilment process, so requestors are notified promptly of the result of their request.

Ram polled group about any questions/comments on Unified Requirements:
- Wording for 3.a. to be discussed on the list.
- 6.e added: The system MUST provide notifications of the progress of a request through the triage-review-fulfilment process, so requestors are notified promptly of the result of their request.

Actions:
- Get to the list and have detailed discussion on these requirements to work out in time for F2F next week.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tsg-access-rd/attachments/20190208/c49ff3a2/attachment-0001.html>