[technology taskforce] Fwd: Request to mailing list At-Large rejected

[Carlton Samuels]

Here's a rule that defies reason...and evidence of this propensity to major
in minor matters!

So, pray tell, in context, what [is]/are [an] "implicit destination[s]"?
And, again in context, might I ask why we are concerned about *how* you
address to send rather than about *what* and *who *sends?

Or, is this rule purely a politically correct surrogate for managing what
is supposed to be an open list?

-Carlton


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <at-large-owner at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Date: Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:28 AM
Subject: Request to mailing list At-Large rejected
To: carlton.samuels at gmail.com


Your request to the At-Large mailing list

    Posting of your message titled "WB Abandoning the
Developed/Developing Country Paradigm from World
 Development Indicators"

has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the
following reason for rejecting your request:

"Blind carbon copies or other implicit destinations are not allowed.
Try reposting your message by explicitly including the list address in
the To: or Cc: fields."

Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator
at:

    at-large-owner at atlarge-lists.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ttf/attachments/20160523/8c598ad4/attachment.html>