Dumb questions about GMT offset in tm structure
seismo!hplabs!hpfcla!hpfclj!hpfcdg!rgt
seismo!hplabs!hpfcla!hpfclj!hpfcdg!rgt
Tue Mar 24 19:55:46 UTC 1987
>Here's a wild idea:
>If the two high order bits of a time_t are 11,...
At this point, I think we should acknowledge that computers are at as
level of sophistication that does not require such an approach to the
problem. (However, I would not be opposed some type of Pascal variant
record formulation which does the same thing.)
Please see my proposal within the last week of defining a parallel
date_t signed long integer which would be days (rather than seconds) in
the UN*X epoch. (The parallel request is that time_t be signed also.)
Using -2147483648 to +2147483647 as the bounds of a 32-bit signed long
integer I compute that it would span around 5.8 million years either
side of Jan 1, 1970.
A date_t and time_t pair of signed long integers could be used together
to give a meridian day for any interesting epoch and a time within the
epoch. The assumed meridian (for existing applications) would be Jan 1,
1970.
> Mark
Ron Tolley
More information about the tz
mailing list