Commentary on time zone policy

[Chris Carrier]

I wrote:
 
>>The current list is divided many ways as to what relationship local mean
>>time (LMT) should have to local clock time (LCT).  ...
 
Nathan Myers > INTERNET:ncm at cantrip.org wrote:
 
>... And all such divisions are completely irrelevant, because nobody who
>decides about time zone law reads this list.
 
You do not know that to be a fact, and if some of the more active people on
this list have their way, persons in positions to make such decisions will be
using this as a resource base.
 
>Please take your opinions about national time zone policies someplace where
>they will make a difference.
 
I don't see anything wrong with including commentary on various actual and
proposed changes.  It is within the scope of this list, or at least not
totally irrelevant to time zoning.  That I voted for candidate X because I
liked his stand on non-time-zone issue Y is irrelevant to this list; opinions
on time zoning issues are not, have come from more people than just myself,
(you may note that I was replying to another proposal in my post) and are,
AFAIK, welcome from the people who run this list.
 
Chris Carrier