Proposal for new ISO C 9x time API
D. J. Bernstein
djb at cr.yp.to
Sat Oct 3 04:39:01 UTC 1998
Markus Kuhn writes:
> The best atomic clock on this planet (CS1 by PTB in Braunschweig) barely
> can do UTC with a real-time precision of one nanosecond.
There are many scientific projects for which nanosecond resolution is
inadequate. ``It's the intervals, stupid.''
> I think attoseconds are horrible overkill.
What exactly do you claim is so ``horrible''? Do you think that you're
going to run out of disk space if you store 16-byte timestamps?
1000 recipients, 28.8 modem, 10 seconds. http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail/mini.html
More information about the tz