Looking for non-TZ-dependent localtime()
mlindner at idttechnology.com
Wed Aug 4 12:37:44 UTC 2004
Paul Eggert wrote:
> GNU/Linux (i.e., glibc) and tzcode are both reasonable.
Thanks for the info. The tzcode code is a lot cleaner and easier to
modify the way I want. All other things being equal (or at least
similar) that's the way to go.
Jonathan Lennox wrote:
> I've attached my message implementing it below. It's based on
> It might be a bit of work to update it to the current version of tzcode;
Thanks! This looks like exactly what I need. Your mods (adding an
"opaque" struct to represent a parsed tz entry) is what I would have done.
pcg at goof.com ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
> localtime is rarely a bottleneck (it might be for your application), so
> this shouldn't be a problem.
Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately, it is a bottleneck in this
More information about the tz