Question about 'tzparse()'
lawless at spamcop.net
Tue Aug 1 23:47:52 UTC 2006
Thank you ever so much for you kind help and assistance.
I appreciate it greatly.
At 01:43 PM 7/31/2006 -0400, Olson, Arthur David \(NIH/NCI\) [E] wrote:
>The bad news is that there is indeed a code problem; the good
>news is that it was only introduced back in February of this
>year (with the first 64-bit-version release).
>The fix should be to move the zeroing of sp->timecnt; the
>suggested patch below incorporates both that change and a fix
>for last week's report on bad goahead/goback logic. (I've chosen
>the path of minimal change in both cases).
More information about the tz