proposed tz patches for Indiana, New Brunswick, Gaza, etc.
Paul.Schauble at ticketmaster.com
Sat Jan 21 02:46:30 UTC 2006
I am inclined to think you should implement the letter of the law rather
than guessing what DOT "really" meant. Either that or ask DOT for
clarification. I hate to say it, but I've been involved in similar things
that became a legal issue and the difference can matter.
Unfortunately, this conflicts with the deadline. Maybe I'm a bit paranoid,
but I'd ask.
From: tz-request at elsie.nci.nih.gov [mailto:tz-request at elsie.nci.nih.gov] On
Behalf Of Deborah Goldsmith
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 7:08 PM
To: tz at lecserver.nci.nih.gov
Subject: Re: proposed tz patches for Indiana, New Brunswick, Gaza, etc.
On Jan 20, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> + -5:00 - EST 2006 Apr 2 2:00
> + -6:00 US C%sT
For all the Indiana counties that are switching from ET to CT, shouldn't
+ -5:00 - EST 2006 Apr 2 2:00
+ -5:00 - CDT 2006 Apr 2 3:00
+ -6:00 US C%sT
so that the time will proceed smoothly from 1:59:59 AM EST to 2:00:00 AM
CDT, as proposed by Paul Eggert?
With the rules the way they are now, the time will go from 1:59:59 AM EST to
1:00:00 AM CST, then from 1:59:59 AM CST to 3:00:00 AM CDT.
Personally, I'm fine either way.
More information about the tz