proposed tz patch for Western Australia

Markus Scherer at
Wed Nov 22 22:23:09 UTC 2006

Small comment -

I understand this reasoning:

On 11/22/06, Paul Eggert <eggert at> wrote:
>     This patch migrates the WA DST idiosyncracies into Rule lines,
>     where they probably belonged anyway.  I realize the official
>     legislation specifies dates rather than "Mar lastSun", but we
>     commonly reverse-engineer the underlying rules in other situations
>     and might as well do so consistently here.

but then there's this proposed rule:

> +Rule   AW      2006    only    -       Dec      3      2:00s   1:00    -

With reverse engineering of rules like lastSun, why not "Dec Sun>=1"?

Best regards,

More information about the tz mailing list