proposed tz patch for Western Australia
markus.icu at gmail.com
Wed Nov 22 22:23:09 UTC 2006
Small comment -
I understand this reasoning:
On 11/22/06, Paul Eggert <eggert at cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
> This patch migrates the WA DST idiosyncracies into Rule lines,
> where they probably belonged anyway. I realize the official
> legislation specifies dates rather than "Mar lastSun", but we
> commonly reverse-engineer the underlying rules in other situations
> and might as well do so consistently here.
but then there's this proposed rule:
> +Rule AW 2006 only - Dec 3 2:00s 1:00 -
With reverse engineering of rules like lastSun, why not "Dec Sun>=1"?
More information about the tz