Jesper Norgaard Welen [mailto:jnorgard at prodigy.net.mx] did write as follows:
How about a simpler version:
...
8:00 1:00 WST 1992 Mar Sun>=1 2:00s
8:00 - WST 2006 Dec Sun>=1 2:00s
8:00 - AS 2009 Mar lastSun 2:00s
8:00 - WST
To which I respond thusly:
Should that third line instead read "8:00 AS WST 2009 Mar lastSun 2:00s"?