Clive D.W. Feather
clive at davros.org
Fri Jul 1 12:34:08 UTC 2011
Robert Elz said:
> Now notice the notable lack of any reference to any table of leap seconds
> in the calculations above. So, we have something that looks like TAI.
> Except the TAI time would be 14 (?) seconds different than this,
> This is a bizarre definition of time from any physics, or astronomy sense,
Actually, it's not dissimilar to UT1.
Clive D.W. Feather | If you lie to the compiler,
Email: clive at davros.org | it will get its revenge.
Web: http://www.davros.org | - Henry Spencer
Mobile: +44 7973 377646
More information about the tz