[tz] "Standard byte order"

Thom Hehl Thom at pointsix.com
Fri Nov 4 14:40:17 UTC 2011


LOL. Two standards. That's a good one, Marshall.

I did see the bit about high-order byte, but had never heard that term
before, but Google shows it is used. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:marshall.eubanks at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 10:39 AM
To: Thom Hehl
Cc: tz at iana.org
Subject: Re: [tz] "Standard byte order"

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Thom Hehl <Thom at pointsix.com> wrote:
> I'm assuming that "Standard byte order" referred to over and over in
the
> docs means Most Significant Byte first?
>
>
>
> It should really be documented that way. As far as I know, there is no
> standard byte order.
>

Well, of course, actually there are two. And that's why it needs to be
specified.

Regards
Marshall

>




More information about the tz mailing list