[tz] "Standard byte order"
Thom Hehl
Thom at pointsix.com
Fri Nov 4 14:40:17 UTC 2011
LOL. Two standards. That's a good one, Marshall.
I did see the bit about high-order byte, but had never heard that term
before, but Google shows it is used.
-----Original Message-----
From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:marshall.eubanks at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 10:39 AM
To: Thom Hehl
Cc: tz at iana.org
Subject: Re: [tz] "Standard byte order"
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Thom Hehl <Thom at pointsix.com> wrote:
> I'm assuming that "Standard byte order" referred to over and over in
the
> docs means Most Significant Byte first?
>
>
>
> It should really be documented that way. As far as I know, there is no
> standard byte order.
>
Well, of course, actually there are two. And that's why it needs to be
specified.
Regards
Marshall
>
More information about the tz
mailing list