[tz] LST

"Martin J. Dürst" duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Fri Oct 14 04:51:07 UTC 2011

On 2011/10/14 12:29, Robert Elz wrote:

> So, using -04:00 just isn't an option, sorry.
> LST, or LT, or almost anything else like that is possible - there's no need
> for it not to be ambiguous, or to be useful, that's already a lost cause,
> just for it to be syntactically consistent with current expectations.

What about something like UNKNOWN or ZZZ or so, then? LST gives the 
impression that it makes sense when it doesn't.

Regards,   Martin.

More information about the tz mailing list