[tz] Rule names

[Tim Parenti]

To answer the question of where to find these rule names, the history of
rule names is found in the Zone definition lines of the source.  For
example, for Asia/Karachi:

# Zone	NAME		GMTOFF	RULES	FORMAT	[UNTIL]
Zone	Asia/Karachi	4:28:12 -	LMT	1907
			5:30	-	IST	1942 Sep
			5:30	1:00	IST	1945 Oct 15
			5:30	-	IST	1951 Sep 30
			5:00	-	KART	1971 Mar 26 # Karachi Time
			5:00 Pakistan	PK%sT	# Pakistan Time


A rule of 1:00 advancement was applied from 1942 Sep until 1945 Oct 15, and
the ruleset named "Pakistan" has been applied since 1971 Mar 26.  You can
then look at the Rule definition lines named "Pakistan" to see that DST has
only been applied in 2002, 2008, and 2009:

# Rule	NAME	FROM	TO	TYPE	IN	ON	AT	SAVE	LETTER/S
Rule Pakistan	2002	only	-	Apr	Sun>=2	0:01	1:00	S
Rule Pakistan	2002	only	-	Oct	Sun>=2	0:01	0	-
Rule Pakistan	2008	only	-	Jun	1	0:00	1:00	S
Rule Pakistan	2008	only	-	Nov	1	0:00	0	-
Rule Pakistan	2009	only	-	Apr	15	0:00	1:00	S
Rule Pakistan	2009	only	-	Nov	1	0:00	0	-


--
Tim Parenti


On 1 February 2013 11:41, Osko, Galatea <Galatea.Osko at morganstanley.com>wrote:

>   Can anyone please advise on where I can find the Rule name history for
> each country/region?****
>
> ** **
>
> The data I'm interested in is as follows:****
>
> - AQ, Oz: I don't know to which area/country this is referring to as it is
> not listed on tiscali ****
>
> - C-Eur, E-EurAsia - are these valid/active rule names in use? or used
> parallel? not sure if any of them is a historic name for Europe that's why
> I'm looking for archived rule names. I believe some of these were used up
> to some point in the past and then switched to a new name...****
>
> ** **
>
> And I also have some other countries like Pakistan, Palestine where I
> would like to check the DST history.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the
> opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not
> constitute, advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall
> Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this
> communication in error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies and
> notify the sender immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to waive
> confidentiality or privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to the
> extent permitted under applicable law, to monitor electronic
> communications. This message is subject to terms available at the following
> link: http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers If you cannot access these
> links, please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to
> you. By messaging with Morgan Stanley you consent to the foregoing.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/attachments/20130201/9d719d7b/attachment.htm>