On Sep 3, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne at joda.org> wrote: > 1) Should there be one zone ID in the main files (not "backward") for > each inhabited ISO-3166 code? (Presumably meaning "*at least* one zone ID"; having only one zone ID for the ISO 3166 code "US" would obviously be wrong, and the same applies to the codes "CA", "RU", and "AU".)