[tz] A New Rule? (was McMurdo/South Pole)
Alan Barrett
apb at cequrux.com
Sun Sep 22 12:33:24 UTC 2013
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013, Bill Seymour wrote:
>>> I liked the syntax proposed by Andy Lipscomb ...
>>>
>>> Zone America/North_Dakota/New_Salem -6:45:39 - LMT 1883 Nov 18 12:14:21
>>> =America/Denver = = 2003 Oct 26 02:00
>>> =America/Chicago = =
>
> Can anyone think of a use case for "use this zone but with a
> different set of rules"?
Yes, I can easily imagine wanting to say "Use the same GMTOFF as
this other zone, but without DST rules." It may be unlikely to be
needed, but I wouldn't want the syntax to forbid that possibility.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the tz
mailing list