[tz] 'date -u' should say "UTC", not "GMT"
Paul Eggert
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Tue Jun 24 22:13:48 UTC 2014
On 06/24/2014 02:34 PM, Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
> Paul Eggert said:
>>> >>UTC, yes. UT?
>> >UT a.k.a. Universal Time" is deliberately ambiguous: it refers to all
>> >the UTx variants together.
> Are you sure of that?
It depends on who you talk to, but that's the sense I intended. You can
see similar usages in the Collins English dictionary and in Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Time#Versions
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/universal-time
I take your point that some sources are stricter, and say that UT must
be UT0 or UT1 (or maybe UT1R or UT2...), so I suppose it's yet another
term that is controversial to some extent.
More information about the tz
mailing list