[tz] Politics of TZ changes
SM
sm at resistor.net
Wed May 14 18:19:45 UTC 2014
At 09:41 14-05-2014, Kim Davies wrote:
>My suggestion would be to focus on what you have proposed without
>the "official international governance" part. What seems to be
>lacking is a best practices document that describes the optimal way
>for the powers-that-be to enact time zone changes. Such a document
>could explain which communities should be advised or consulted in
>enacting such a change, and the recommended amount of lead times
>that different industries need for changes to propagate. It could
>also describe potential risks (such as economic impacts) of making
>such changes, particularly with a short lead time.
I agree that it would be better to focus on the suggestion without
"official international governance". The intent of the time zone
database is a record of the time set on the clocks in a region. The
database can be used as a source of information for someone in a
different location to find out the local time in a region.
The problems could be:
(a) The short lead time
(b) Lack of information about the time change
(c) Politics
I gather that everyone agrees that it is better to stay far away from (c). :-)
>If such a best practices document existed, that would be a good
>foundation that one could use to pursue awareness with the relevant
>governing agencies. Jumping straight to official governance route
>seems to me to less likely to achieve anything. In my experience,
>governments are generally quite eager to have practical documents
>developed by experts that they can use to help guide them. They do
>not have to have to be enforced by treaty to have utility.
The suggestion might be about having a best practices document for
(a) and (b). It's a good idea. One of the issues is how to do that
without getting near (c). I would suggest having a file similar to
the Theory file to explain (a) and (b).
Regards,
-sm
More information about the tz
mailing list