[tz] Chile TZ rule 1942 June superfluous? PS
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Fri Apr 3 16:17:07 UTC 2015
> On 2015-03-29 18:46, Paul Eggert wrote about the Chile rules:
>> Yes, that's right. The line mentioning "Jul 15" can be removed without changing
>> the meaning of the data. I don't know why that line is there, but I suppose we
>> can remove it.
> The same seems to hold true for the line
> Rule Chile 1947 only - Apr 1 4:00u 0 -
> because its precursor
> Rule Chile 1946 only - Sep 1 3:00u 0:00 -
> does the same, and (current) usage of the Chile rules never
> starts after 1946-09-01T03Z and on or before 1947-04-01T04Z.
Yes, that also seems correct; removing the 1947 line causes no change to the
More information about the tz