[tz] [EXT] Re: Uruguay out of DST
richard_gombert at goodyear.com
Tue Jul 14 11:32:33 UTC 2015
I do now that several years ago Oracle did not release a Java update that included the TZdata updates for a change in Timezone information until 72 hours after the change went into affect.
Large companies like Oracle, Microsoft, etc. move as fast a Governments.
From: tz-bounces at iana.org [mailto:tz-bounces at iana.org] On Behalf Of Steve Allen
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 1:39 PM
To: Time Zone Database discussion
Subject: [EXT] Re: [tz] Uruguay out of DST
On Fri 2015-07-10T10:24:49 -0700, Paul Eggert hath writ:
> Also, there's overhead to making a release. Even when data can be
> 99.999% verified there is still benefit to having ten releases a year
> instead of fifty, if ten will do.
> Downstream users of the tz database need to be reasonably prompt in
> applying new releases anyway. Governments sometimes decide changes
> only a few days before they take effect, so if users care about
> timestamps, OS release schedules simply cannot require three-month
> delays. This is true regardless of whether we issue a new
> Uruguayan-related tz release this week or next week.
I think we should expect that these economics and timing of timezone information authority, packaging, and distribution will change if the Time Zone Data Distribution Service (tzdist) becomes a widely implemented standard.
Changing the distribution of the information from OS updates to on-demand web service may mean that the IANA efforts of this mail list, Apple, Microsoft, Google, etc. will all have to decide how they want to fit into that new model of "publishers" and "providers".
This current discussion about Uruguay seems to be leading toward that process.
Steve Allen <sla at ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855
1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
More information about the tz