[tz] Chile TZ rule 1942 June superfluous? PS
michael.deckers at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 31 18:19:35 UTC 2015
On 2015-03-29 18:46, Paul Eggert wrote about the rules for Chile:
> Yes, that's right. The line mentioning "Jul 15" can be removed without changing
> the meaning of the data. I don't know why that line is there, but I suppose we
> can remove it.
Same for the line
Rule Chile 1947 only - Apr 1 4:00u 0 -
which does the same as its precursor
Rule Chile 1946 only - Sep 1 3:00u 0:00 -
and which is superfluous as there is (currently) no usage
of the Chile rules starting after 1946-09-01T03 and before
or on 1947-04-01T04.
More information about the tz