[tz] NIST leap-second file not yet updated

Random832 random832 at fastmail.com
Fri Feb 19 00:36:07 UTC 2016

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 16:59, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2016-02-18 13:32, Random832 wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016, at 14:08, Brian Inglis wrote:
> >> It is the closest European licence to public domain and allows all uses
> >> for all purposes, including deriving and sublicensing.
> >> The Copyleft Clause is unfortunately named but serves only to ensure the
> >> terms of the licence may not be restricted in copies or derivations.
> >> It does not appear to be a GNU copyleft which restricts uses.
> >
> > I think you're confused about what the GNU copyleft is if you think this
> > is a coherent statement. The GNU copyleft _exactly_ "ensures the terms
> > of the license may not be restricted in copies or derivations", I don't
> > know what else you think it "restricts uses". The problem is that this
> > prevents a work (or portions thereof) covered by the license from being
> > incorporated in a larger work that has components under restrictive
> > licenses (such as commercial UNIX derivatives)
> Which is a restriction not in the BSD licences and public domain works.  

Right, but it _is_ in the EUPL. All I'm saying is that you haven't
actually articulated what difference you believe exists between "GNU
copyleft" and EUPL copyleft.

More information about the tz mailing list