[tz] NIST leap-second file not yet updated

[Brian Inglis]

On 2016-02-18 14:09, Arthur David Olson wrote:
> Ultimately the language added gets decided by the IERS; we needn't necessarily make a decision. We might identify options (concise, verbose, by reference, or otherwise) that work for us and present those options to the IERS for their consideration.

Since the IERS published leap-seconds.list, copyright status and IPR treaties could be preventing NIST from creating a derived work, which could perhaps be resolved more quickly by your suggested input to IERS.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada