[tz] Joda-Time, Time4J, and Java SE 8

[Paul Eggert]

On 07/08/2016 01:34 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I would recommend keeping the Time4J line in tzlink separate from the
> Joda-Time/Java 8 line, as while Joda-Time and Java 8 have a lot in
> common, Time4J doesn't have any history in common at all. It also
> allows you to simplify the license part, which is complex as written.

Thanks, I tried to take all that into account by installing the attached 
patch. This also adds a subsection for Java to try to organize things a 
bit better (much as we've already done for JavaScript).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Update-Java-8-etc.-description.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4602 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/attachments/20160719/7acefd1b/attachment.bin>