[tz] Historical discrepancies for Italy.

[David Cochrane]

That the German-occupied northern part of Italy observed DST on different 
dates than the rest of Italy in 1944 helps explain the different dates given 
by Shanks and www.inrim.it. Shanks has an ending date for DST in 1944 that 
matches one part of Italy and www.inrim.it has an ending date that matches 
the other part of Italy. Evidently the dates given by both Shanks and 
www.inrim.it are correct but apply to different regions of Italy.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pierpaolo Bernardi" <olopierpa at gmail.com>
To: "Gent, R.H. van (Rob)" <R.H.vanGent at uu.nl>
Cc: <tz at iana.org>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [tz] Historical discrepancies for Italy.


> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Gent, R.H. van (Rob) <R.H.vanGent at uu.nl> 
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The German-occupied part of Italy probably followed that of Germany, the 
>> liberated part probably followed that of the UK.
>
> Actually, the German controlled part officially was RSI, a puppet
> state governed by Mussolini, and that page quotes an RSI  law as RSI,
> Presidenza, fasc. 57 / Decreto-legge del Duce n. 604 del
> 19.09.1944-XXII (i.e. decrees from Mussolini).
>
> For the southern part the references are Regio decreto-legge n. 92 del
> 29.03.1944 / Decreto-legge luogotenenziale n. 219 del 14.09.1944 (i.e.
> royal decrees).
>
> Sigh.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> signature database 14331 (20161024) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> 


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 14331 (20161024) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com