[tz] Are tzdata2016g & tzdata-latest missing the VERSION file?
Paul Eggert
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Fri Sep 30 18:53:09 UTC 2016
On 09/30/2016 11:04 AM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
>
> There would be little harm in keeping the version in the repository's
> Makefile as well.
I'm afraid I see some harm. Yes, bumping the release could be done
automatically or semiautomatically as part of a release procedure, along
the lines that Paul Koning suggested. But this would mean that the only
time the repository Makefile's version number would be correct would be
near the time of a release; at most other points of time the version
number would be wrong, and this would be confusing. Also, it would mean
that bumping the release would not be an atomic operation, as it is now.
I'm also worried that downstream distributors will modify the data but
still call it "2016g". We are considering installing the version number
along with the other data; if we do that, this mislabeling problem will
get worse because the wrong label will become part of the runtime
environment, and having the wrong version number in a development
Makefile will likely contribute to the mislabeling.
More information about the tz
mailing list