[tz] tzdb timezone names/identifiers and links
Lester Caine
lester at lsces.co.uk
Thu Feb 28 08:18:57 UTC 2019
On 28/02/2019 06:03, Michael Douglass wrote:
> Beyond the nuisance aspect of all this the use of such names is a bar to
> using this information in a number of systems. It may not be the only
> issue but it is one we can deal with.
And kick the problems of actually providing useful data to ALL systems
further into the long grass? Many systems simply can't use the TZ data
currently because there is no way of knowing just what version of data
is provided with the CURRENT name. Hiding the data even further under
even more isolated identifiers helps no-one.
At the end of the day there has to be a system that when feed with a
location can provide a reliable LIST of rules even if those rules
include 'don't know' for times pre-1970. Pretending the likes of the
time changes during the second world war never happened is just as
political a decision as returning the wrong data for EXISTING rule sets
currently! Any system using TZ currently should NOT return offsets for
dates prior to 1970 ...
That TZ IS currently only going to produce a subset of the rules and not
even flag when those rules change seems to be a fact of life, so what IS
needed now is to get tzdist running properly and for 'interested
parties' to provide their own providers with their own set of names. The
current set of rule names can then STILL be managed and provide a
backward compatible source for current normalised data and more
importantly flag where a timestamp IS outside of the scope of the data
set! But there seems to be no interest in anybody providing such a service?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - https://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - https://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - https://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - https://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - https://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
More information about the tz
mailing list