[tz] [PROPOSED] Merge timezones that are alike since 1970
David Patte
dpatte at relativedata.com
Sun May 30 01:54:13 UTC 2021
Why should tz take on all the political fights itself and have to fight
over Tibet, Gaza, Kosovo, Hong Kong? Its a waste of time. Are you really
a better judge of world standards, sensitivities and world diplomacy
than the ISO? Of course not.
Punt this to the organization that is charged with this issue. Let
people aregue with them. They are not perfect, but it is their job. Why
force everyone downstream to have to make all those political decisions
again when 98% will end up using ISO anyway?
(1) To make tz far more useful to far more users, there should be a
separate zone for each ISO country and at least the largest city in that
country, ie: Canada/Toronto. Then every defined zone should have
historical data as far back as possible. Splitting starting at some
particular date (1970) is a good way of limiting the db size and
relative accuracy. It then satisfies the need of far more people, more
easily, without having to be processed downstream.
Or (2) remove all politics, and country names, and go to only
code-numbered zones, with the local name of the largest city in that
zone, and let your downstream users add their politics themselves - most
of which will split them into countries as was suggested in (1), most
using standrized politics anyway by starting with ISO. It will make tz
simpler, smaller, and less useful - but at least all the arguments here
will be gone as well.
But the way it is right now, even before this current suggestion, tz is
half useful to many users, and tainted with its own political
insensitivities. Remove all those sensitivities, or use a standard,
making the DB more useful.
On 2021-05-29 20:59, Paul Eggert via tz wrote:
> I haven't seen any realistic proposal to change this.
More information about the tz
mailing list